Transocean Liners Reederei G.m.b.H. v Euxine Shipping Company Ltd (Imvros)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1999
Year1999
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 cases
  • Compania Sud Americana De Vapores SA v Sinochem Tianjin Import & Export Corporation
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • July 24, 2009
    ...Canadian Transport Ltd v Court Line Ltd [1940] AC 934 and Transocean Liners Reederei GmbH v Euxine Shipping Co Ltd (The Imvros) [1999] 1 Lloyd's Rep 848 applied, The Panaghia Tinnou [1986] 2 Lloyd's Rep 586 considered. The question as to the applicability of Art. IV Rule 2(a) was quintes......
  • Aprile S.PA. v Elin Maritime Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • April 18, 2019
    ...places specific reliance on the decisions of Saville J, Langley J and Hamblen J in The Danah [1993] 1 Lloyd's Rep 351, The Imvros [1999] 1 Lloyd's Rep 848 and The Socol 3 [2010] 2 Lloyd's Rep 221, respectively. These decisions, it asserts, are all supportive of the Owner's case: the word......
  • Onego Shipping & Chartering BV v JSC Arcadia Shipping (The "Socol 3")
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • April 23, 2010
    ...not involve a duty to Charterers to do so. This is made clear by the two recent decisions referred to by the Tribunal: The Imvros [1999] 1 Lloyd's Rep 848 and Compania Sud American Vapores v MS ER Hamburg [2006] 2 Lloyds's Rep 66. 42 Nevertheless, in the leading case of Court Line v Canadia......
  • Agile Holdings Corporation v Essar Shipping Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • May 11, 2018
    ...of the vessel. As such, it could be seen as designed to reverse the effect of the well-known decision of Langley J in The Imvros [1999] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 848. This was to the effect that on the clauses in question the charterer was liable for all the effects of bad stowage, whether that led to......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
  • Carrier not liable for loss of or damage to cargo - The Elin
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • August 22, 2019
    ...former circumstance in the case of Joseph Travers & Sons, Limited v Cooper (1915) 1 KB 73 and in the latter case in The Imvros (1999) 1 Lloyds Rep 848, a decision of Langley J., in which the words of the Charter Party were "Charterers are permitted to load cargo on the vessel's deck...p......
  • The 'ELIN' – Deck Cargo And Exclusion Clauses
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • August 5, 2019
    ...Ltd - "PEPNAUTIC" [2004] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 174 - Singapore Court of Appeal - Jai Sharma of Clyde & Co acted in both these cases 3 [1999] 1 Lloyd's Rep 848 The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT