Trebeck v Croudace
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1918 |
| Date | 1918 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 cases
-
Wills (A.p.) v Bowley (on Appeal from a Divisional Court of the Queen's Bench Division)
...a case in which the liberty of the subject is concerned, we cannot go beyond the natural construction of the statute." 11 The case of Trebeck v. Croudace [1918] 1 K.B. 158 C.A. is in my view distinguishable from the present case. In that case the police officer was held entitled to make t......
-
Walker v Lovell (on Appeal from a Divisional Court of the Queen's Bench Division)
...Thorpe (Thomas) supra. In support of this, he cited the decisions in Wiltshire v. Barrett [1966] 1 Q.B. 312 especially at 321, 322; Trebeck v. Croudace [1918] 1 K.B. 158 and Barnard v. Gorman [1941] A.C. 378. Wiltshire v. Barrett was a case under the section corresponding to section 5 (5)......
-
Wiltshire v Barrett
...Gorman. 1941 Appeal Cases, pp. 378, 387. On examining this statute, I find it very similar to the statute considered by this Court in Trebeck v. Croudacs. 1918, 1 King's Bench, p. 158. Just as Lord Wright thought that in that context "drunk" meant "apparently drunk" (see 1941 Appeal Cases ......
- Tobias and Charles v Hill
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Offences and Case Law
...proper control "), Mr. Justice Greer heldthat'drunk'iswhat an ordinary reasonable person would considersuch,'and inTrebeck v. Croudace (82 J.P. 69), where a man was arrestedbutuponbeing examined by a doctor was found to be not drunk, it was decidedthat the police officer was not liable to d......
-
Recent Judicial Decisions
...with Lord Justice Greenethat it was wrongly decided." ..."Ifthe view of the Court of Appeal in the case ofTrebeck and Croudace(34Times Law Reports, p. 57; (1918)IK.B.158) was that where the offence, for which a constable 16THEPOLICEJOURNALhas it in mind to arrest a person, is one of immedia......
-
House of Lords
...was unnecessary to consider the validity 33,0THEJOURNALOFCRIMINALLAWof the general proposition first enunciated in Trebeck v.Croudace (1918, 1K.B.,158) and stated by BankesL.J.inIsaacs v. Keech (1923, 2K.B.at 360) in the followingterms-"that the whole trend of authority has been...to holdth......