Trevillian & Betties Case

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date01 January 1721
Date01 January 1721
CourtCourt of the King's Bench

English Reports Citation: 81 E.R. 953

King's Bench Division

Trevillian & Betties Case

trevillian & betties case. Action sur le case pur diverse slanderous parols, que le defendant, ad parle del plaintiff, come il fuit a rogue, a base rogue, a cozening rogue, a coney-catching rogue, a cut-purse rogue, et oustea dit, que il voile ceo prover, et ceo fuit argue per Harris & Crooke, al Barre, & Mountague Dodd. & Bought, al Banck, et ils vnement agree, que 954 TRIN. 17 JAC. BANG. BEGIS PALMER, 11. ceux parols ne sont actionable. Et un Balls case, 35 Eliz. fuit cite, ou action fuit port vers un pur ceux parols. You are a cut-purse, and there is uo purse cut within fourty miles, but you have a share in it: et fuit adjudge, que ceux parols ne sont actionable sans averment, que fuerint ascun purse cut a mesrae temps; Mountague in le case al Barre les parols sur que le plaintiff doit insister sont rogue, et les parols adjective enauant in le case ne sont auter que agravation in heate de son anger. Haught. Adire que un home est cut-purse, n'est actionable nient pluis que adire, que il est un filtching fellow, car ceux parols ne impose aacun special crime sur le home. Dodd. Jeo agree, que si ieo dye de vous, que vous estes un bankrupt knave, que in ceo case action serra maintain vera tnoy pur ceo, come est 4 Rep. 19. Car bankrupt esfc [11] parol de infamy, et bien conus est le...

To continue reading

Request your trial
18 cases
  • R v Aaron Leonard Goodman
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 8 April 2008
    ...Management Services Ltd (5) Mr Talal Issa Ghanem Al-kawari (6) Mr Martin Bowen (7) Mr Geoffrey White (8) Mr David Lloyd (9) Mr Harold Palmer (10) Ms Frances Cook (11) Middle East South Africa Energy (pty) Ltd (13) Vuma Petroluem Ltd (14) Vuma Zambia Ltd (zambia) (15) Pegasus Energy Zambia L......
  • Ir Re Pennefather, Deceased Savile v Savile
    • Ireland
    • Chancery Division (Ireland)
    • 26 March 1895
    ...Robinson v. Robinson (7), Cleary's Trusts (8). The decision in Jordan v. Adams (9) does not apply to the present case, nor does Palmer v. Palmer (10). The Earl of Tyrone v. Marquis of Waterford (11) is really an authority in our favour, for there the father and sons were treated (1) Willes'......
  • Christ's Hospital v Grainger
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Chancery
    • 1 January 1847
    ...& Or. 257), Hculdlesea v. Neville (4 Beav. 28), Dean v. HickinbotlMm, (4 Hare, 302), Wembmrne Union v. Mawon (7 Beav. 309), Matchitt v. Palmer (10 Sim. 241. And the cases collected in 9 Jur. 1002, 1054 and 1071). iph.w. christ's hospital r. grainger 775 On the application of the New Orders ......
  • Bertolacci v Johnstone
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Chancery
    • 5 December 1843
    ...order: Haddelsea v. Nevile (4 Beav. 28), Lloyd v. Wait (4 Myl. & Cr. 257), Attorney-General v. Nethercoat (2 Myl. & Cr. 604), Maichitt v. Palmer (10 Sim. 241). And it could not be sustained as an original motion, for the Plaintiff had not supported it by the necessary evidence : Haddelsea v......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
2 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT