Trim Joint District School Board of Management v Kelly
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Year | 1914 |
Date | 1914 |
Court | House of Lords |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
71 cases
- Golden Hope Rubber Estate Ltd v Muniammah and Others
- Weston v Great Boulder Gold Mines Ltd
-
Chief Adjudication Officer v Faulds
...which is not expected or designed." 62 But those final words may be open to misconstruction. The question arose in Board of Management of Trim Joint District School v. Kelly [1914] A.C. 667 whether the word "designed" excluded an injury inflicted by pre-meditated violence. It was held that ......
- Gray v Barr
Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
-
The plea of accident in the criminal law
...L.J. in Gray v. Barr [1971] 2 All E.R. 949, at p. 962. 14 Per Lord Loreburn in Trim Joint District School Board of Management v. Kelly [1914] A.C. 667, at p. 681 cited Phillimore, L.J. in Gray v. Barr, supra n. 13, at p. 967. 15 Uoydv. General Iron Screw Collier Co. (1864) 3 H. & G. 284, at......
-
4. “It's Part of the Job”: Violence at Work
...15. Lewis, R., Compensation for Industrial Injury, Professional Books, Abingdon, 1987. 16. See, Trim Joint District School Board v. Kelly (1914) AC, 667. 17. The success rate before industrial tribunals in 1984 was 28.7 per cent, Employment Gazette, February 1986, p. 48. 18. Keys v. Shoefay......
-
Recent Judicial Decisions
...the view that "a word must always take its meaningfrom its context"?Ifnot then the BoardofManagementof'TrimJoint District Schoo/v.Kelly [1914] A.C. 667 is worth study. Might mention be also made quietly that theoriginal plethora of charges looks suspiciously like overkill or pique?October 4......
Request a trial to view additional results