Tucker v Oldbury Urban Council

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1912
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
12 cases
  • Walsh v Sligo County Council
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 20 December 2010
    ...1 K.B. 22. Trustees of the British Museum v. Finnis (1833) 5 Car. & P. 460; 172 E.R. 1053. Tucker v. Oldbury Urban District Council [1912] 2 K.B. 317. Turner v. Walsh (1881) 6 App. Cas. 636; 50 L.J.P.C 55; 45 LT 50. Turner v. Wright (1860) 2 De G.F. & J. 234; 45 E.R. 612. Vandeleur v. Glynn......
  • Baker v R
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 15 August 2012
    ...R v O'Brien [1978] 1 SCR 591 at 599. 56 [1913] 2 KB 130 at 137–138, citing Sturla v Freccia (1880) 5 App Cas 623 at 633 and Tucker v Oldbury Urban Council [1912] 2 KB 317 at 321. 57Bannon v The Queen (1995) 185 CLR 1 at 9–10. 58 (1995) 185 CLR 1 at 27–28. 59 (1995) 185 CLR 1 at 38. 60 See ......
  • Walsh & Cassidy v Sligo County Council
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 20 December 2010
    ...be bound by an admission made by another person (see Foster v. McMahon (1847) 11 Irish Equity Reports 287, 299; Tucker v. Oldbury UDC [1912] 2 K.B. 317). Where, however, there is some privity of interest between the party and the person who made the statement, the admission of the latter ma......
  • R. v. Underwood (G.R.),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 18 January 2001
    ...statement was, to the knowledge of the deceased, contrary to his interest" (per Fletcher Moulton in Tucker v. Oldbury Urban Council , [1912] 2 K.B. 317, 321.' "The first and second principles enunciated by the Ontario Court of Appeal in Demeter were, in part [at p. 141]: '1. The declaration......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • The Hearsay Rule and Confessions Relied upon by the Defence: R v Myers
    • United Kingdom
    • International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 1-3, July 1997
    • 1 July 1997
    ...J, speaking for the Supreme Court of Canada, held: 9 R v Rogers (1994) 158 JPR 909 at 914-15. See also Tucker v Oldbury Urban Council [1912] 2 KB 317 at 10 See generally D. J. Birch, ‘Hearsay-Logic and Hearsay-Fiddles: Blastland Revisited’ in P. Smith (ed.). 11 J. H. Wigmore (rev. J. H. Cha......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT