Turner v Commonwealth & British Minerals Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 2000 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
33 cases
-
Dyson Technology Ltd v Strutt
...in giving an enforceable meaning to very similar words, including the word "involved", in a restrictive covenant in Turner v Commonwealth & British Minerals Limited [2000] IRLR 114. 54 The fourth point raised by Mr Supperstone on the construction of clause 19.1 is not so much a question of ......
-
Dorma UK Ltd v Chris Bateman and Others
..."As was observed by Lord Denning MR in Littlewoods Organisation v Harris [1977] 1WLR 1472 at 1479 and by Waller LJ in Turner v Commonwealth and British Minerals Limited [2000] IRLR 114 at para 18, it is because there may be serious difficulties in identifying precisely what is or what is ......
-
East England Schools CIC (trading as 4Myschools) v Luci Palmer and Another
...Clarke JSC. 22 See TFS Derivatives Ltd v Morgan [2004] EWHC 3181 (QB), [2005] IRLR 246, at [43], per Cox J., applying Turner v Commonwealth & British Minerals Ltd [2000] IRLR 114 at [14], per Waller 23Jackson v Dear [2012] EWHC 2060 (Ch) at [40], per Briggs J; quoted with approval in BMA S......
-
Mary Caroline Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd
...that the judge was also right to favour a construction which validated rather than invalidated the clause and relied on Turner v Commonwealth and British Minerals Ltd [2000] IRLR 114 in which Waller LJ said:- "14. There is in my view some interconnection between the question of construction......
Request a trial to view additional results