Turner v Goldsmith

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1891
Date1891
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
12 cases
  • Lian Fatt Sawmill Co; Tang Chiok Sing
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Bauman v Hulton Press
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
  • Lavarack v Woods of Colchester Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 19 July 1966
    ...discontinued their business altogether, or transferred it to someone else, he would not thereby be deprivedof his compensation, see Turner v. Goldsmith, 1891, 1 Queen' Bench, p. 544: Brace v. Calder, 1895, 2 Queen' Bench, p. 253. Nor should he be deprived of it because, after he left, they ......
  • Luxor (Eastbourne) Ltd v Cooper
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 12 December 1940
    ...agents or without paying them a gross sum in compensation. It all depended on the construction of the contract. On the other hand, in Turner v. Goldsmith, 1891, 1 Q.B. 544, the Court of Appeal held that under the contract in its express terms no term could be implied that the agreement was......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT