Tyldesley v TML Plastics Ltd
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Date | 1996 |
| Court | Employment Appeal Tribunal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
14 cases
-
Strathclyde Regional Council v Wallace
...that case. 22In my judgment the law was correctly stated by Mummery J. giving the judgment of the Employment Appeal Tribunal in Tyldesley v. T.M.L. Plastics Ltd. [1996] I.C.R. 356, in which he followed and applied the earlier E.A.T. decisions in Calder v. Roundtree Mackintosh Confectionary......
- Council of the City of Sunderland v Brennan and Others (No 1)
-
Nelson v Carillion Services Ltd
...which I derive from Byrne and Tyldesley [Financial Times Limited -v—Byrne (No 2) [1992] IRLR 163 and Tyldesley -v—TML Plastics Limited [1996] ICR 356, two decisions of the EAT which I have not thought it necessary or helpful to discuss], all that is required for the burden of proof to be sh......
- Barton v Investec Henderson Crosthwaite Securities Ltd
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...Appeal (Civil Division) transcript No 2156 of 1999 68 Twinsectra Ltd v Yardley [2000] Lloyd’s Rep PN 239, CA 211 Tyldesley v TML Plastics [1996] ICR 356, [1996] IRLR 395, EAT 115–116 Underwood, Son & Piper v Lewis [1894] 2 QB 306, 64 LJQB 60, 42 WR 517, CA 192 Uratemp Ventures Ltd v Collins......
-
The Use of Language in Judgments
...article 119 of the E.C. Treaty (O.J. 1992 No. C.224) and the Equal Pay Directive (Council Directive (75/117/E.E.C.)) have as their 14 [1996] ICR 356 EAT at 361. 116 How Judges Decide Cases: Reading, Writing and Analysing Judgments purpose the elimination of sex discrimination, not that of a......