Unilever Plc v Chefaro Proprietaries Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1994
CourtChancery Division (Patents Court)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
33 cases
  • Spind Malaysia Sdn Bhd v Justrade Marketing Sdn Bhd and Others
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Arrow Generics Ltd v Akzo NV
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session (Inner House - First Division)
    • 20 May 2008
    ...sub nom Merck & Co Inc's PatentsUNKUNK [2003] EWCA Civ 1545; [2004] FSR 330; 27 (3) IPD 27021 Unilever plc v Chefaro Proprietaries LtdUNK [1994] RPC 567 Valensi v British Radio CorpUNKUNK [1972] FSR 273; [1973] RPC 337 Wheatley v Drillsafe LtdUNK [2001] RPC 7 Windsurfing International v Tab......
  • Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd and another v Merrell Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 12 October 2007
    ...of such a person. 17 What now becomes stage (2), identifying the inventive concept, also needs some elaboration. As I pointed out in Unilever v Chefaro [1994] RPC 567 at page 580: “It is the inventive concept of the claim in question which must be considered, not some generalised concept to......
  • Generics [UK] Ltd t/a Mylan v Yeda Research and Development Company Ltd and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 29 July 2013
    ...has later copied, or applied to patent the invention himself, may be factors of weight in appropriate cases: see as to patenting e.g. Unilever v Chefaro [1994] FSR 567. One of the matters often taken into account in assessing obviousness has always been whether the invention brings with it ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT