Unilever Plc v Procter and Gamble Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1999 |
| Date | 1999 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
73 cases
-
P (A Child)
...their evidence; this is a well-known appellate consideration which requires no amplification here: see Piglowska v Piglowski [1999] UKHL 27, [1999] 3 All ER 632, [1999] 1 WLR 1630, and Biogen Inc v Medeva plc [1997] RPC 1, discussed more recently in the decision of this Court of Re A (Child......
-
Gregory John Rollingson v James Hollingsworth
... ... This matter concerns Rollingsons Solicitors Limited (“the Company”); which company, carried on a solicitors' practice, but which, ... London Council [1989] AC 1280 and Robert Walker LJ in Unilever plc v The Procter & Gamble Co [2000] 1 WLR 2436 ... With the benefit of ... ...
-
Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster) v Lee (t/a Cropton Brewery)
...does it matter that the threat is made in response to an enquiry from the party threatened: Unilever plc v. Procter & Gamble Co. [1999] F.S.R. 849, 860 (Laddie J.), citing Skinner v. Shew [1893] 1 Ch. 413. In Brain v. Ingledew Brown Benison & Garrett [1996] F.S.R. 341, 349 Aldous L.......
-
(1) Michael Daniel Worsley Hardy (2) Kenneth Harrap (3) National Westminster Bank Plc v (1) Michael Fowle (2) Gail Fowle
... ... 9 th June 1988 made in the bank's favour by the Defendants' then company Bramridge Developments Limited (“Bramridge”), and a subsequent ... at para 24–29 at (a) and (c), citing Robert Walker LJ in Unilever v Procter & Gamble [2000] 1 WLR 2436 CA at 2444D-F. (112) Mr ... ...
Get Started for Free