Unilever Plc v Procter and Gamble Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1999 |
| Date | 1999 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
72 cases
-
R v K
...CA. Sporrong v Sweden (1982) 5 EHRR 35, ECt HR. Unilever plc v Proctor & Gamble Co [2001] 1 All ER 783, [2000] 1 WLR 2436, CA; affg [1999] 2 All ER 691, [1999] 1 WLR Walker v Wilsher (1889) 23 QBD 335, CA. AppealThe husband, K, appealed against Judge Karsten QC’s ruling at a preparatory hea......
-
LS v PS
...law, there are established exceptions to this form of privilege. In Unilever plc v The Proctor & Gamble Co [1999] EWCA Civ 3027, [2000] 1 WLR 2436, Robert Walker LJ explained the basis of the rule in these terms:- “[35] … the without prejudice rule is founded partly in public policy and p......
-
Penny Ann Lavis v Nursing and Midwifery Council
...for a tribunal fully to articulate. Lord Hoffman described this in Piglowska v Piglowski [1999] UKHL 27, [1999] 3 All ER 632, [1999] 1 WLR 1630, quoting what he had earlier observed in Biogen Inc v Medeva plc [1997] RPC 1, thus: 'The need for appellate caution in reversing the trial judge......
-
AAG Investments Ltd v BAA Airports Ltd
...to an impropriety unless the privilege is itself abused. That, it seems to me, is what Robert Walker LJ meant in the Unilever case [2000] 1 WLR 2436 when he repeatedly spoke in terms of the abuse of a privileged occasion, or of the abuse of the protection of the rule of privilege: see at p......
Request a trial to view additional results