Unilever Plc v Procter and Gamble Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1999 |
| Date | 1999 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
80 cases
-
(1) Michael Daniel Worsley Hardy (2) Kenneth Harrap (3) National Westminster Bank Plc v (1) Michael Fowle (2) Gail Fowle
... ... 9 th June 1988 made in the bank's favour by the Defendants' then company Bramridge Developments Limited (“Bramridge”), and a subsequent ... at para 24–29 at (a) and (c), citing Robert Walker LJ in Unilever v Procter & Gamble [2000] 1 WLR 2436 CA at 2444D-F. (112) Mr ... ...
-
Pearson Education Ltd v Prentice Hall India Private Ltd
...principal authority on the question of the use of documents that are in fact without prejudice is Unilever plc v Proctor & Gamble [2000] 1WLR 2436, and in particular the judgment of Robert Walker LJ at page 2444. Robert Walker LJ said: "Nevertheless, there are numerous occasions on whic......
-
Berkeley Square Holdings and Others v Lancer Property Asset Management Ltd
... ... The 6 th Defendant was until 2018 the holding company of Lancer. The 2 nd to 5 th Defendants are directors of Lancer and of ... exceptions to the WP rule were considered by Robert Walker LJ in Unilever Plc v Proctor & Gamble Co [2000] 1 WLR 2436 , in what Lord Clarke in ... ...
-
Penny Ann Lavis v Nursing and Midwifery Council
...which it is sometimes difficult for a tribunal fully to articulate. Lord Hoffman described this in Piglowska v Piglowski [1999] UKHL 27, [1999] 3 All ER 632, [1999] 1 WLR 1630, quoting what he had earlier observed in Biogen Inc v Medeva plc [1997] RPC 1, thus: 'The need for appellate cautio......
Get Started for Free