Unilever v Frisa
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 2000 |
| Date | 2000 |
| Court | Chancery Division (Patents Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 cases
-
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation v Clonmel Healthcare Ltd
...by an award of damages’ and adopted with approval the observations of Laddie J. in the English case of Unilever plc v Frisa N.V. [2000] F.S.R. 708. He stated specifically that ‘there is no hostility, inherent or otherwise, to the grant of interlocutory injunctions in patent infringement pr......
-
TNS Group Holdings Ltd v Nielsen Media Research Inc.
...of a European patent to seek to rely upon what has been referred to as the “spin-off value” of a judgment of this court. 24 In Unilever plc v. Frisa N. V. [2000] F.S.R. 708, 713 Laddie J. said this: “Furthermore, there is an advantage of proceedings being conducted here in accordance with t......
-
Unilin Beheer BV v Berry Floor NV
...under the new legal system is to be the Board of Appeal of the EPO. 20 He also relied on what was said by Laddie J in Unilever v Frisa [2000] FSR 708 at p.713: For example, it is possible that the court here would come to the conclusion that the patent is valid and infringed. It grants reli......
-
Condensed Aminodihydrothiazine Derivative & The Patents Act 1992
...that a stay would cause'; (c) the third case cited by McCracken J. was the decision of Laddie J. in Unilever plc v. Frisa N.V. [2000] FSR 708 at p 716 where Laddie J. said:- 'The reason, it appears to me why Aldous L.J. has said what he has said in Kimberly-Clarke concerning the desirabili......
Request a trial to view additional results