United Engineering Workers' Union v Devanayagam
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Court | Privy Council |
| Judgment Date | 1967 |
| Date | 1967 |
| Year | 1967 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
20 cases
- Bata Shoe Company Guyana Ltd and Others v Commissioner of Inland Revenue and Attorney General and; Guyana Unit Trust Management Company Ltd and Others v Commissioner of Inland Revenue and Attorney General
- Ang Beng Teik v Pan Global Textile Bhd. Penang
-
Application of Neilan
...CONSTITUTION SAORSTAT EIREANN ART 66 CONSTITUTION ART 13.6 LYNHAM V BUTLER 1933 67 ILTR 121 UNITED ENGINEERING WORKERS UNION V DEVANAYAGAM 1968 AC 356 SHANAHAN, STATE V AG 1964 IR 239 SOLICITORS ACT 1954, IN RE 1960 IR 239 EAST DONEGAL CO-OPERATIVE LIVESTOCK MARTS LTD & ORS V AG 1970 IR ......
-
Tomasz Zalewski v The Workplace Relations Commission, an Adjudication Officer [Y], Ireland and the Attorney General
...in McCarthy J.'s observation in Keady that the matter is really one of impression rather than definition. Later again, in United Engineers Workers' Union v. Devanayagam [1968] A.C. 356, the Privy Council, by a narrow majority, overturned the decision of the Supreme Court of Ceylon that a l......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
COURT
...applying the law are its accepted hall marks. See: Moses v. Parker (1896) A.C. 245 and United Engineering Workers Union v. Devanayagam (1968) A.C. 356. Notwithstanding what has been stated above, in sum judicial acts may be identified by their procedural or substantive quality alone or by ......