United Horse-Shoe and Nail Company v Stewart & Company
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judgment Date | 12 March 1888 |
Date | 12 March 1888 |
Docket Number | No. 7. |
Court | House of Lords |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
15 cases
- Asia File Products Sdn Bhd v Brilliant Achievement Sdn Bhd & 2 Ors
-
Nottinghamshire Healthcare National Health Service Trust v New Group Newspapers Ltd
...realised by the owner of the patent if the sales had been made by him (see United Horse-shoe and Nail Co. Ltd. v. John Stewart & Co. (1888) 13 App. Cas. 401). An example of this is Boyd v. Tootal Broadhurst Lee Co. Ltd. (1894) 11 R.P.C. 175 where the plaintiff manufacturers proved that a pr......
-
Morris-Garner and another v One Step (Support) Ltd
...so. In case (i), the measure of damages is the profits which he has lost by the diversion of sales to the infringer: United Horse-Shoe and Nail Co Ltd v John Stewart & Co (1888) 13 App Cas 401. This is the same as the ordinary measure of damages for breach of a non-compete agreement. In cas......
-
Vestergaard Frandsen A/S (now called MVF 3Aps) (a company incorporated under the laws of Denmark) and Others v Bestnet Europe Ltd and Others
...have achieved the same result without infringing the claimant's rights. This is the principle established in The United Horse Shoe and Nail Company Ltd v John Stewart & Co (1988) LR 13 App Cas 401 where the pursuer's patent for a machine for making horse-shoe nails had been infringed. The d......
Request a trial to view additional results