Leighton v The Information Commissioner (No.2)
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judge | Judge Wikeley |
| Neutral Citation | [2020] UKUT 23 (AAC) |
| Court | Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) |
| Subject Matter | Information rights,Tribunal procedure,practice,Information rights - Data protection,Information rights - Information rights: practice,procedure,practice - fair hearing,Wikeley,N |
| Date | 17 January 2020 |
| Published date | 19 February 2020 |
Leighton v Information Commissioner (No.2)
[2020] UKUT 23 (AAC)
IN THE UPPER TRIBUNAL Appeal No. GIA/1399/2019
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS CHAMBER
THE TRIBUNAL PROCEDURE (UPPER TRIBUNAL) RULES 2008
On appeal from the First-Tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) (Information Rights)
First-tier Tribunal (FTT) case no: EA/2018/0052/GDPR
FTT Hearing Date: 30 April 2019 (Judge A. McKenna, Chamber President)
Between:
Mr Wayne Francis Leighton (Applicant)
v
The Information Commissioner (Respondent)
Before: Upper Tribunal Judge N Wikeley
Hearing date: 9 January 2020
Representation:
Appellant: In person
Respondent: No attendance
NOTICE OF DETERMINATION OF APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL
I refuse permission to appeal.
This determination is made under section 11 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 and
rules 21 and 22 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008.
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
Dransfield v Information Commissioner (Section 50: Jurisdiction): [2020] UKUT 346 (AAC)
...B5. There is a more concise account of those principles set out in my later decision in Leighton v Information Commissioner (No.2) [2020] UKUT 23 (AAC) at paragraph 35. There is, furthermore, a very helpful analysis of the principles governing recusal in the decision of Upper Tribunal Judge......
-
Crossland v Information Commissioner and Leeds City Council
...B5. There is a more concise account of those principles set out in my later decision in Leighton v Information Commissioner (No.2) [2020] UKUT 23 (AAC) at paragraph 35. There is, furthermore, a very helpful analysis of the principles governing recusal in the decision of Upper Tribunal Judge......
-
Osifeso v Information Commissioner
...Information UA-2020-001601-GIA, formerly GIA/830/2020 10 Osifeso v Information Commissioner [2022] UKUT 146 (AAC) Commissioner (No.2) [2020] UKUT 23 (AAC), the first occasion on which the Upper Tribunal had given any consideration to section 166, was not published until 19 February 2020, li......
-
Scranage v Information Commissioner
...month period in which the Commissioner is still considering the complaint. As I observed in Leighton v Information Commissioner (No.2) [2020] UKUT 23 (AAC) (emphasis in the “31. I note that in Platts v Information Commissioner (EA/2018/0211/GDPR) the FTT accepted a submission made on behalf......