Crossland v Information Commissioner (Recusal, Strike Out and Excluded Decisions (Judicial Review)) [2020] UKUT 264 (AAC)
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judge | Judge Wikeley |
| Neutral Citation | [2020] UKUT 264 (AAC) |
| Court | Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) |
| Subject Matter | Information rights,Tribunal procedure,practice,Information rights - Information rights: practice,procedure,practice - fair hearing,practice - leave/permission to appeal,Wikeley,N |
| Date | 23 June 2020 |
| Published date | 08 September 2020 |
Crossland v Information Commissioner (Recusal, Strike Out and Excluded Decisions (Judicial Review)) [2020] UKUT
264 (AAC)
1
IN THE UPPER TRIBUNAL Appeal No. GIA/26/2020
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS CHAMBER
THE TRIBUNAL PROCEDURE (UPPER TRIBUNAL) RULES 2008
Applicant: Mr Terry Crossland
Respondent: The Information Commissioner
Tribunal: First-tier Tribunal (Information Rights)
Tribunal Case No: EA/2019/0252
Tribunal Venue: in chambers
Decision Date: 4 November 2019
NOTICE OF DETERMINATION OF RECUSAL APPLICATION
I refuse the application by the Applicant that I should recuse myself from dealing
with this application for permission to appeal (and any further applications or
appeals involving the Applicant).
REASONS
1. On 2 December 2019 Mr Crossland made an application to the Upper Tribunal for
permission to appeal against an interlocutory decision or decisions made by the First-tier
Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) (Information Rights) [“the FTT”]. The application and
appendices ran to a total of 163 pages.
2. On 9 December 2019 an Upper Tribunal Registrar wrote to Mr Crossland seeking clarity
as to which specific decision by the FTT he was seeking to appeal (p.164).
3. On 16 December 2019 Mr Crossland replied (pp.165-166).
4. On 9 January 2020 I signed off Directions indicating that I proposed to strike out the
application dated 2 December 2019 on the basis that either the Upper Tribunal had no
jurisdiction to deal with the application and/or the application had no reasonable prospects of
success (pp.167-171). Those Directions were issued by the Upper Tribunal office on 4
February 2020.
5. On 9 February 2020 Mr Crossland wrote making an application that he be provided with
electronic copies of all documents in the proceedings in addition to the hard copies as provided
for by the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008.
6. On 14 February 2020 I dismissed Mr Crossland’s application to receive electronic copies
of all documents in the proceedings (pp.175-177). This ruling was issued by post by the Upper
Tribunal office on the same date.
To continue reading
Request your trial