Darren Hills and Lynne Hills v The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judge | Judge Sinfield,Judge Brannan |
| Neutral Citation | [2016] UKUT 0189 (TCC) |
| Court | Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) |
| Subject Matter | Tax,25 April 2016 |
| Date | 25 April 2016 |
| Published date | 01 December 2016 |
[2016] UKUT 0189 (TCC)
Reference: UT/2014/0055
UT/2014/0056
VALUE ADDED TAX – option to tax- whether supply of land taxable at standard
rate because option to tax validly exercised – whether prior permission from HMRC
required for late election – whether HMRC can validly dispense with this
requirement for prior permission – paragraph 3 (9) and paragraph 30 Schedule 10
Value Added Tax Act 1994
UPPER TRIBUNAL
TAX AND CHANCERY CHAMBER
DARREN HILLS and LYNNE HILLS Appellants
- and –
THE COMMISSIONERS FOR
HER MAJESTY’S REVENUE AND CUSTOMS Respondents
TRIBUNAL:
JUDGE GREG SINFIELD
JUDGE GUY BRANNAN
Sitting in public at the Royal Courts of Justice, London on 8 and 9 February
2016
Rebecca Murray, counsel, instructed by The VAT Consultancy, for the
Appellants
Hui Ling McCarthy, counsel, instructed by the General Counsel and Solicitor to
HM Revenue and Customs, for the Respondents
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2016
To continue reading
Request your trial