Lindsay Hackett v The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
JudgeMr Justice Trower,Judge Herrington
Neutral Citation[2020] UKUT 0212 (TCC)
CourtUpper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)
Subject MatterTax,6 July 2020
Date06 July 2020
Published date06 July 2020
[2020] UKUT 0212 (TCC)
Appeal number:UT/2017/0040
VALUE ADDED TAX - procedure - personal liability notice - FA 2007, Sch 24,
para 19 - application of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights -
appellant's application for a stay - whether HMRC's decision to proceed by way of
civil penalty instead of a criminal prosecution an abuse of process - whether
standard of proof should be the criminal standard - application to admit into
evidence a prior tribunal decision
UPPER TRIBUNAL
TAX AND CHANCERY CHAMBER
LINDSAY HACKETT
Appellant
- and -
THE COMMISSIONERS FOR HER MAJESTY’S
Respondents
REVENUE & CUSTOMS
TRIBUNAL:
Mr Justice Trower
Judge Timothy Herrington
Hearing conducted remotely by video conference deemed to be held in London
on 8 June 2020
John M Burton QC and Peter Woodall, Counsel, of the Public Defender Service,
for the Appellant
Jonathan Kinnear QC and Howard Watkinson, Counsel, instructed by the
General Counsel and Solicitor to HM Revenue and Customs, for the
Respondents
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2020
2
DECISION
Introduction
1. This is an appeal from the decision of the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) (Judge
Roger Berner) released on 23 November 2016. By that decision (the Decision) the
FTT made four case management decisions as follows:
(1) Not to stay the proceedings of the appeal of the appellant (Mr Hackett)
against the decision of the respondents (HMRC) to give Mr Hackett a
personal liability notice under paragraph 19 of Schedule 24 to the Finance Act
2007 ("FA 2007") in respect of a deliberate inaccuracy penalty imposed on a
company of which Mr Hackett was the sole director. The FTT rejected Mr
Hacketts contention that HMRCs decision to proceed against Mr Hackett in
this way rather than prosecuting him in a criminal court was an abuse of the
FTTs process.
(2) Not to stay the proceedings of Mr Hacketts appeal until he had obtained a
representation order from the Legal Aid Agency.
(3) That the appropriate standard of proof in the appeal proceedings was the
civil and not the criminal standard.
(4) That it would be an abuse of process for Mr Hackett to dispute in the
present appeal facts and issues determined by the FTT in Intekx Limited v
HMRC [2014] UKFTT 277 (TC) (Intekx 2014). Accordingly, the FTT
directed that the FTTs decision in that appeal should be admitted as evidence in
the proceedings relating to Mr Hacketts appeal.
2. On 17 March 2017 the Upper Tribunal (Judge Herrington) granted Mr Hackett
permission to appeal against all but the first of those decisions. On 6 June 2017,
following an oral hearing, Judge Herrington also granted Mr Hackett permission to
appeal against the first of those decisions. The appeal against the second of those
decisions is no longer pursued because Mr Hackett has now, after a lengthy delay,
been granted legal aid in order to pursue his appeal in the FTT and this appeal.
Background
3. Mr Hacketts underlying appeal to the FTT concerns the decision of HMRC to
notify Mr Hackett on 17 March 2015 of a personal liability notice in the sum of
£12,833,984.49 under Paragraph 19 of Schedule 24 to FA 2007. Mr Hackett was, at
all material times, the sole director of Intekx Limited (“Intekx”). Also on 17 March
2015, HMRC notified Intekx of a deliberate inaccuracy penalty assessment in the sum
of £12,833,984.49 under section 97 of and Schedule 24 to FA 2007. HMRC contend
that there were deliberate, and in some cases deliberate and concealed, inaccuracies in
Intekxs VAT returns in respect of the VAT periods 07/09 to 07/13 inclusive, on the
basis of which it was notified of the penalty assessment, and that these inaccuracies
were wholly attributable to Mr Hackett as the sole director of the company. HMRC

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT