A v Hoare
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Neutral Citation | [2008] UKHL 6 |
| Court | House of Lords (England) |
| Date | 2008 |
| Year | 2008 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
43 cases
-
Jeffrey Jones and Others v The Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change (First Defendant) Coal Products Ltd (Second Defendant)
...1 WLR 782 276 (unreported) Court of Appeal 30 January 1990. 277 [1994] 4 All ER 439 278 [1994] 1 WLR 1234 279 [1997] 8 Med LR 125 (CA) 280 [2008] UKHL 6 281 [2005] 1 AC 76 282 [1997] QB 402 283 In London Strategic Health Authority v Whitson [2010] EWCA Civ 195, it was noted that these obser......
-
TPE v Harvey Franks
... ... 74 It is plain from the authorities that the reasons why the claim was brought outside of the relevant time limit is a central consideration in relation to s 33. In A v Hoare [2008] 1 AC 844 , the House of Lords over-ruled its own previous decision and held that the time limit for bringing a claim for intentional injuries could be extended under s 33. In giving the leading judgment Lord Hoffmann held that the question as to the effect on an actual Claimant of his ... ...
-
Rachel Catherine Ellam v George Ellam
... ... By this time, of course, it was clear from the decision in Stubbings (supra) that any claim was irretrievably statute barred ... 28 On 30 January 2008 the House of Lords gave judgment in A v Hoare [2008] 1 AC 844 , in which the House declined to follow Stubbings (supra) and found that section 11 of the 1980 Act (and with it section 33, permitting extension of the limitation period) applied to claims in respect of intentional injury ... 29 On about 4 February ... ...
-
Adorian v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis
...believed that the limitation period for such claims was six years, but in January 2008 the House of Lords' decision in R v Hoare [2008] UKHL 6; [2008] 1 AC 844 established that it was three. The claim was thus issued just in time; but it was met with an application to strike it out pursuan......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Tort Law
...in deserving cases. The Singapore Act does not contain such a discretionary provision. The House of Lords” recent decision in A v Hoare[2008] UKHL 6 is an example of how the discretionary provision may be used quite liberally in some cases. Land-related torts 22.62 OTF Aquarium Farm v Lian ......