Valensi v British Radio Corporation
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1972 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
36 cases
- Stack v Brisbane City Council
-
Arrow Generics Ltd v Akzo NV
...Civ 1545; [2004] FSR 330; 27 (3) IPD 27021 Unilever plc v Chefaro Proprietaries LtdUNK [1994] RPC 567 Valensi v British Radio CorpUNKUNK [1972] FSR 273; [1973] RPC 337 Wheatley v Drillsafe LtdUNK [2001] RPC 7 Windsurfing International v Tabur Marine (GB) LtdUNK [1985] RPC 59 Textbooks etc. ......
-
Mölnlycke Health Care AB v Brightwake Ltd (Trading as Advancis Medical)
...concept of enablement is also used in the context of the law of sufficiency of disclosure and cited the judgment of Buckley LJ in Valensi v British Radio Corp [1973] RPC 337 and the judgment of Lloyd LJ in Mentor v Hollister [1993] RPC 7. Lord Hoffmann held that the tests for enablement and......
-
Synthon BV v Smithkline Beecham Plc (No.2)
...skilled in the art". The question of what will satisfy this test has been discussed in a number of cases. For example, in Valensi v British Radio Corporation [1973] RPC 337, 377 Buckley LJ said: "The hypothetical addressee is not a person of exceptional skill and knowledge, that he is not ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
'Storyline patents': are plots patentable?
...IPR 385, 397-9 (Sheppard J); AMP Incorporated v Utilux Pty Ltd (1971) 45 ALJR 123, 128 (McTiernan J); Valensi v British Radio Corporation [1973] RPC 337, 376-7 (Russell, Buckley and Cairns (63) CCOM Pty Ltd v Jiejing Pty Ltd (1994) 51 FCR 260, 277 (Spender, Gummow and Heerey JJ). (64) Paten......