Varley v Whipp

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1900
CourtDivisional Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
20 cases
  • Sisa Logos and Emblems v Quest Security Services Ltd
    • Jamaica
    • Supreme Court (Jamaica)
    • 26 September 2012
    ...they are not of merchantable quality and are unfit for the purpose of providing the required protection for the guards. 24 In the case of Varley v Whipp 1 QB 513, a buyer agreed to purchase a reaping machine which it had not seen but was described by the seller as having been acquired the p......
  • Wee Lian Construction Sdn Bhd v Ingersoll-Jati Malaysia Sdn Bhd
    • Malaysia
    • Court of Appeal (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Harlingdon and Leinster Enterprises Ltd v Christopher Hull Fine Art Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 15 December 1989
    ...sale of the goods is made. 15 I think that the authorities to which we were referred are consistent with this view of section 13(1). In Varley v. Whipp (1900) 1 QB 513 the defendant agreed to buy from the plaintiff a reaping machine, which the defendant had not seen, but which the plaintiff......
  • Hill (Christopher) Ltd v Ashington Piggeries Ltd (Description)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 24 February 1971
    ...correspond with the description; �" 9The language used is directed to the identification of goods. The point is made by Channell J. in Varley v. Whipp [1900] 1 Q.B. 513 at p. 516: "The term 'sale of goods by description' must apply to all cases where the purchaser has not seen the goods,......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT