Vibe Technologies Ltd's Application No 2390030

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtTrade Marks Registry
Judgment Date2008
Year2008
Date2008

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
10 cases
  • Lidl Great Britain Ltd v Tesco Stores Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 19 April 2020
    ...Given my findings above and having regard to the principles on distinctive character identified by Arnold J in Vibe Technologies Ltd [2009] E.T.M.R 12 at [61]–[65] and Enterprise Holdings Inc v Europcar Group UK Ltd [2015] FSR 22 at [144]–[152], including the need to make an overall assessm......
  • Lidl Great Britain Limited & Anor v Tesco Stores Limited & Anor
    • United Kingdom
    • Intellectual Property Enterprise Court
    • 19 April 2023
    ...229. Given my findings above and having regard to the principles on distinctive character identified by Arnold J in Vibe Technologies Ltd [2009] E.T.M.R 12 at [61]-[65] and Enterprise Holdings Inc v Europcar Group UK Ltd [2015] FSR 22 at [144]-[152], including the need to make an overall as......
  • Fine & Country Ltd and Others v Okotoks Ltd (formerly Spicerhaart Ltd) and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 31 July 2012
    ...eligible for registration unless article 3(3) of the Directive applies.” 244 217. Kerly at paragraph 8–016 states that in Vibe Technologies [2009] ETMR 12 at [61]-[65] the following five propositions were “correctly described as being well settled” (by Richard Arnold QC as he then was). Und......
  • Société Des Produits Nestlé SA v Cadbury UK Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 20 January 2016
    ...I shall assume that the reader is familiar with my first judgment and with my decision sitting as the Appointed Person in Vibe Technologies Ltd's Application [2009] ETMR 12 which is referred to in my first 6 The Court of Justice delivered its judgment on 16 September 2015. Cadbury accepts t......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
  • Nestlé's Two And Four-Finger Kit Kat Shape Marks Held To Be Invalid
    • Singapore
    • Mondaq Singapore
    • 16 February 2016
    ...to buy the goods. This was cited with approval by Phang J in Nation Fittings ([2006] 1 SLR(R) 712) as well as Arnold J in Vibe ([2009] ETMR 12). In the present case, Chan J agreed that reliance of the shape as a badge of origin is necessary, although he accepted that it would be difficult f......