Le Vicar de Wainsbouroughs Case
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1657 |
| Date | 01 January 1657 |
| Court | Court of Common Pleas |
English Reports Citation: 124 E.R. 180
COMMON BANCK AND EXCHEQUER
le vicar de wainsbouhougks case. Le Vicar de Wainsbourough, libel verfus les frerea dun Monastery pur le Loppings de Wood. Et Finch Recorder move pur Prohibicon qua fuit grant, intant que fuit done al pur firewood. LITTLETON, 149. PASOH. 4 CAR. IN COMMUNI BANCO 181 Mes Richardson donque mise cest difference; Car il dit in [149] ascun cases les bodies del arbres lou eat ouster lo age de 20 aims priviledge les branches, iu ascuns nemy; si fueront arbres quo ne fueront loppe devant le age do 20 anna le body est perpetualment priviledge al branches. Mes ai voet Loppe Oake ou Ashe, que est deina 20 anna de growth les boughs & branches sont touts foita dismable. Nota que un Ganford fuit lie in obligacon de 2001. al Ch. Rogers ove Condicon, a paier luy 100 1. mes ceo fuit in trust al use de Mary Watkins...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Hewison v Meridian Shipping Services Pte Ltd
...had been recognised from before the 17 th century and is referred to in Lord Coke's Commentaries on The Laws of England by Littleton: Co Litt. 148. 78 In Hunter v Butler [1996] R.T.R. 396, 405, Hobhouse L.J. said:— "If a plaintiff comes to court and asserts as part of her case that she woul......
-
Daniel Delacherois, - Plaintiff in Error; Nicholas Delacherois, - Defendant in Error
...Rents (p. 183), Comyn's Digest (Suspension, F.); or when the purchaser does not have the absolute fee simple in both manor and tenancy. Co. Lit. (148, &.), Brooke's Abridgment (Extinguishment, pi. 48), Viner's Abridgment (Abr. Manor. N. pi. 2, and pi. 4 ; Citing Bro. Ab., Release, pi. 86, a......
-
Salmon v Smith
...must be an eviction or expulsion of the lessee, out of all or some part of the demised premises; he must be put out of possession. Co. Litt. 148 b. Hob. 190, Dorrel v. Andrews. Bro. Apportionment, 7. 1 Vent. 277, per Hale C.J. in Hodgkin-s v. Robson. Sty. 446, Timbrell v. Bullock. Clayt. 34......
-
Rivis v Watson
...common law by the act of the party ; and if divided, the power of distress is gone, without attornment by the tenant (sect. 222 ; see Co. Lit., 148 a.). [Parke, B. It seems to be doubtful, whether a fee-farm rent of this kind be a rent-charge or a rent-service; see Mr. Margrave's note to Co......