Vinos v Marks & Spencer Plc
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
| Year | 2001 |
| Date | 2001 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
161 cases
-
Eric Walton v Pickerings Solicitors
...factor to take into account. On its own, it is capable of being a “good reason” for making an order under CPR Rule 6.15Vinos v Marks and Spencer Plc [2001] 3 All ER 784. In that case, Peter Gibson LJ noted at [27]: “That the circumstances specified in sub-paragraphs (a), (b) and (c) of Rule......
-
Totty v Snowden Hewitt v Wirral and West Cheshire Community NHS Trustt
...the case an appropriate share of the court's resources, whilst taking into account the need to allot resources to other cases.” Vinos v Marks & Spencer plc 15The Court of Appeal considered in Vinos v Marks & Spencer plc, unreported, 8th June 2000 the inter-relationship between rule ......
-
Steele v Mooney and Others
...serve the claim form but has been unable to do so; and (c) in either case, the claimant has acted promptly in making the application." 15 In Vinos, this court had to consider the relationship between rule 3.10 and rule 7.6(3). The claimant issued his claim form about one week before the exp......
-
Keen Phillips (A Firm) v Field
...7.6 (extension of time for serving a claim form) does so, and in this respect he relies on the decision of this court in Vinos v Marks & Spencer plc [2001] 3 All ER 784, particularly at 792 where Gibson LJ said: "It is plain that the general power in r 3.1(2) (a) to extend time cannot overr......
Get Started for Free
3 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Decision Highlights Dangers Of Filing Claim Form Electronically On Final Day For Service
...and sealed by the court. As for the scope of CPR 3.10, it was clear from the Court of Appeal decision in Vinos v Marks & Spencer plc [2001] 3 All ER 784 and the line of authority following it, that this rule cannot be used to override specific CPR provisions. The claimants were, in effect, ......
-
Court Of Appeal Decision Highlights Dangers Of Filing Claim Form Electronically On Final Day For Service
...and sealed by the court. As for the scope of CPR 3.10, it was clear from the Court of Appeal decision in Vinos v Marks & Spencer plc [2001] 3 All ER 784 and the line of authority following it, that this rule cannot be used to override specific CPR provisions. The claimants were, in effect, ......
-
Court Of Appeal Upholds Strike Out For Late Service Of Claim Form
...four month period. The Claimants challenged the High Court's decision on two grounds. Firstly, applying Vinos v Marks & Spencer Plc [2001] 3 ALL ER 784, they argued that the Court could not rectify the Defendant's failure to challenge jurisdiction in the Acknowledgement of Service. Specific......