Vinos v Marks & Spencer Plc
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 2001 |
| Year | 2001 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
147 cases
-
Eric Walton v Pickerings Solicitors
...to make an order to extend time. 42 Some support for this conclusion can be found in the decision of the Court of Appeal in Vinos v Marks and Spencer Plc [2001] 3 All ER 784. In that case, Peter Gibson LJ noted at [27]: “That the circumstances specified in sub-paragraphs (a), (b) and (c) o......
-
Steele v Mooney and Others
...15 March 2004, Deputy District Judge Smith acceded to the application and amended the two orders accordingly. She distinguished Vinos v Marks and Spencer plc [2000] 3 All ER 784 to which we shall refer later in this judgment. She said that it was the understanding of both parties that what ......
-
Totty v Snowden Hewitt v Wirral and West Cheshire Community NHS Trustt
...to the case an appropriate share of the court's resources, whilst taking into account the need to allot resources to other cases.” Vinos v Marks & Spencer plc 15The Court of Appeal considered in Vinos v Marks & Spencer plc, unreported, 8th June 2000 the inter-relationship between rule 7.6 a......
-
Keen Phillips (A Firm) v Field
...as Rule 7.6 (extension of time for serving a claim form) does so, and in this respect he relies on the decision of this court in Vinos v Marks & Spencer plc [2001] 3 All ER 784, particularly at 792 where Gibson LJ said: "It is plain that the general power in r 3.1(2) (a) to extend time cann......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Decision Highlights Dangers Of Filing Claim Form Electronically On Final Day For Service
...and sealed by the court. As for the scope of CPR 3.10, it was clear from the Court of Appeal decision in Vinos v Marks & Spencer plc [2001] 3 All ER 784 and the line of authority following it, that this rule cannot be used to override specific CPR provisions. The claimants were, in effect, ......
-
Court Of Appeal Decision Highlights Dangers Of Filing Claim Form Electronically On Final Day For Service
...and sealed by the court. As for the scope of CPR 3.10, it was clear from the Court of Appeal decision in Vinos v Marks & Spencer plc [2001] 3 All ER 784 and the line of authority following it, that this rule cannot be used to override specific CPR provisions. The claimants were, in effect, ......
-
Court Of Appeal Upholds Strike Out For Late Service Of Claim Form
...four month period. The Claimants challenged the High Court's decision on two grounds. Firstly, applying Vinos v Marks & Spencer Plc [2001] 3 ALL ER 784, they argued that the Court could not rectify the Defendant's failure to challenge jurisdiction in the Acknowledgement of Service. Specific......