Voisey, ex parte, Re Knight

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1881
Year1881
CourtCourt of Appeal

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
13 cases
  • Greater London Council v Connolly
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 13 January 1970
    ...in the light of the established authorities on the point, and there are three which strike me as important. The first is the case of Ex parte Voisey (1882 21 Ch. D. 442); and the two most relevant passages are in the Master of the Rolls' judgment at page 456 and in the judgment of Lord Just......
  • Chandos Construction Ltd. v. Deloitte Restructuring Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 2 October 2020
    ...Ltd., [2011] UKSC 38, [2012] 1 A.C. 383; Hobbs v. The Ontario Loan and Debenture Company (1890), 18 S.C.R. 483; Ex parte Voisey (1882), 21 Ch. D. 442; Ex parte Williams (1877), 7 Ch. D. 138; Coopérants, Mutual Life Insurance Society (Liquidator of) v. Dubois, [1996] 1 S.C.R. 900; A.N. Bail ......
  • Regent Oil Company Ltd v J. A. Gregory (Hatch End) Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 15 October 1965
    ...in the present case comas to an end on death or assignment. That it is not a mere personal covenant is, I think, implicit in the case of re Voisey, ( 21 Chancery Division, page 442), where it was held binding against the trustee in bankruptcy who was, of course, the assign by statute of the......
  • United Scientific Holdings Ltd v Mayor, Aldermen and Burgesses of the County Borough of Burnley now The Council of the Borough of Burnley
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 23 March 1977
    ...surviving relic the ancient remedy of distress. To attract the remedy of distress rent must be certain at the time that it falls due. Ex parte Voisey (1882) 21 Ch. D. 442 was a case about the validity of a distress for a fluctuating rent and what was said there about the necessity for certa......
  • Get Started for Free