Vyricherla Narayana Gajapatiraju (Raja) v Vizagapatam Revenue Divisional Officer
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1939 |
| Year | 1939 |
| Court | Privy Council |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
160 cases
-
Bocardo SA v Star Energy UK Onshore Ltd
...in value was entirely due to the road-building scheme. But other cases are more difficult. One such case is the so-called Indian case [1939] AC 302. It is difficult partly because of the unusual facts (the proposed anti-malarial works consisted of closing unhealthy wells which supplied seve......
- Yates Property Corporation (in Liquidation) v Boland
-
Waters and Others v Welsh Development Agency
...buyer be regarded as under any urgent necessity to buy, to adapt the words of Lord Romer in Raja Vyricherla Narayana Gajapathiraju v Revenue Divisional Officer, Vizagapatam [1939] AC 302, 312. 17 On an arm's length sale in the open market a seller would normally expect to realise any enhanc......
-
Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Dominica Appellant v Jacqueline Theodore Respondent [ECSC]
...to be awarded to the respondent under this head. Raja Vyricherla Narayana Gajapatiraju v The Revenue Divisional Officer, Vizagapatam [1939] A.C. 302 applied. 2. There is no reason to vary the findings of fact made or inferences drawn by the Board in determining the amount of compensation w......
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
Case Comments: Some judicial guidelines for establishing the value of immovable property in friendly sequestrations
...Court Pretoria 1960 (4) SA 34 (T) at 40D; Sri Raja Vyricherla Narayana Gajapatiraju v The Revenue Divisional Officer, Vizagapatam [1939] AC 302 (PC) at 312). The parties are required to be willing and desirous of concluding the transaction but not anxious or driven to do so (Todd v Administ......
-
Preliminary sections
...G.B. Ollivant Ltd. v. Korsah (1941) 7 W.A.C.A. 118……………………………………….....…855 Gajapatiraju v. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Vizagapatam (1939) A.C. 302 P.C…………114 Gambo v. Turdam (1993) 6 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 300) 500…………………………….........………292, 295 Gamboruma & Ors. v. Borno (1997) 3 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 4......