W. v Egdell

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1989
Year1989
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
6 cases
  • Public Prosecutor v Dato' Seri Anwar bin Ibrahim
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • January 1, 2001
  • Breen v Williams
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • W. v Egdell
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • November 9, 1989
    ...it necessary to consider whether, had W succeeded, he could have recovered damages in contract for shock and distress. SIR JOHN MAY[1989] 2 W.L.R. 689. At page 693 the judge described the circumstances: "About ten years ago W shot the four members of a neighbouring family. He shot another n......
  • Wenden v. Trikha et al.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • June 27, 1991
    ...P.2d 1198, refd to. [para. 58]. Peabody v. Parkinson Cinbaland Co., [1984] 3 All E.R. 529, refd to. [para. 63]. W. v. Edgell et al., [1989] 1 All E.R. 1089, refd to. [para. Angus and J.A. Angus Investments Ltd. v. Edmonton (City) (1977), 3 A.R. 116 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 67]. Crits and Cri......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles