Walden & Gesner v & Ursy & Ursy
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1662 |
| Date | 01 January 1662 |
| Court | Court of the King's Bench |
English Reports Citation: 82 E.R. 270
King's Bench Division
walden & gesner versus ursy & uksy. Walden & Gesner Vicounta de Coventry & Lichfield port det versus Ursy, & Ursy, pur 71. & 6d. pur fees due pur prisont un T. condemne al defendant en 1811. sur brave al eux direct hora de c Court. Et il plead 28 Eliz. que nul vie. &c. prendra pur serveing un execution pluia, que in le mesme statute est limiter, & appoynt, scilicet, Is. pur cheseun 20s. lou le summe ne exceeder 1001. & 6d. of, and for every 20s. being over and above the said sum of 1001. Nota, que le defendant plead le proviso en mesme le statute ; that this Act shall not extend to fees to be taken within any city, &c. Judgement, quia appiert per declaration, fuit fait diens, le Citty de Coventry. 1. Primerment, si le vie. icy devoit estre aver forsque 41. 6d. pur tout 1'execution Germin pur le defendant, que cy: entant, que al common ley ne poet aver ascun fee de common droit, & ne puit aver contract pur un fee & cite Batle et Sailer's case, Et issint c statute, est introductio novi juris, & a prise strictment, et icy poet estre expound ambideux voys Crew accord, et nest inconvenient, que avera pluis fee pur un 1001. que pur 1991. Entant, q^ lou est grand summe la serra satisfye bien, commentq^ n'ad la. pur 20s. del primer hundred. Doderidge e contra; Le statute admitter d'eatre ambideux conatructions, et perc le vere meannig d'estre enquire. Le mischief devant fuit, cjj vie. voilont estre slack en feasont executions, quia fuer al grand danger et nul profit, quia si le party pris escaper, action sur le case gist vers le vie. beside le trouble, et expence de conveyer, et garder luy en prison. Et le statute ore intend a constitute un indifferency inter le oppression del suitors, et le avarice del officer. Efc pur ceo le danger est greinder lou le summe est greinder, serra dure a doner luy miender fee pur le greiuder, summe levy. Jones accord. Cest statute ad engendered trois questions. Premierement, le nature del action, si det gist, et adjudge que cy : entant, cj^ quand un summe, est done per le statute, comment^ nul summe est appoynt uncore det gist. Probe et Lumly's case fuit cite accord esteant ils Vic. de London. [52] Intrat. P. 14 Jac. Rot. 531. Issint debt gist sur le statute, 2 E. 6. pur dismes. Secondement, les parols del statute esteant, He that maketh execution, &c. que avera la fee. Quand le vie. fait son mandat al bayliff d'un liberty, q^ fait le...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
White v Collins
...Britton v. Twining, 1817, 3 Mer. 182. Discussed, Chambers v. Taylor, 1837, 2 My. & Cr. 387; Montgomery v. Montgomery, 1845, 3 Jo. & Lat. 51; 8 Ir. Eq. Rep. 745. Considered, Jordan v. Adams, 1859-61, 6 C. B. N. S. 762; 9 C. B. N. S. 494. Approved, Pedder v. Hunt, 1887, 18 Q. B. D. 572. [289]......
-
Perrin v Blake
...C. 369; Doe d. Small v. Allen, 1800, 8 T. R. 504; Poole v. Poole, 1804, 3 Bos. & P. 628. Discussed, Montgomery v. Montgomery, 1845, 3 Jo. & Lat. 51. Not applied, Phillips v. Phillips, 1847, 10 Ir. Eq. R. 519. Considered, In re Johnson's Trusts, 1866, L. R. 2 Eq. 720. Referred to, edder v. H......
-
Pope and Haman
...the Court answered, that both should have their fees, and wheresoever the sheriff hath double trouble, he shall have double fees. Vide Latch, 51. English Reports Citation: 90 E.R. 438 IN THE COURT OF KING'S BENCHPope and Haman pope and haman. Post, 220. Poundage not to be for executing jud......
-
Perrin and Another, v Blake, Widow
...C. 369; Doe d Allen v. Small, 1800, 8 T. R. 504; Poole v. Poole, 1804, 3 Bos. & P. 628. Discussed, Montgomery v. Montgomery, 1845, 3 Jo. & Lat. 51. Not applied, Phillips v. Phillips, 1847. [2579] pebbin and another, versus blake, Widow. (S. C. 1 Bl. 672.) Thursday, 8th Feb. 1770. Whether th......