Walker against Hull
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1793 |
| Date | 01 January 1793 |
| Court | Court of the King's Bench |
English Reports Citation: 83 E.R. 357
COURT OF KING'S BENCH
Walker against Hull
walker against hull. Executors bound by covenant of apprenticeship. Covenant against an executor, on the covenant of the testator to teach an apprentice his trade: and after verdict for the plaintiff 'twas moved in arrest of judgment, that this covenant was personal to the testator, and did not oblige the executors, but only obliged the master during his life to teach the apprentice : bub by the Court, it obliged the executors also; and they ought to see the apprentice taught his trade, and ii they are not of the same trade, they ought to assign him to another who is of the trade, so that he may be taught...
To continue reading
Request your trial
5 cases
-
The Case of a Parol Administration
...chattels in his [407] own right doth die, the heir at common law is he that (a) See 20 Geo. 2, c. 19. (b) See the case of Walker v. Hall, 1 Lev. 177. Wadsworth v. Grey, 1 Sid. 216. Rex v. Peck, Salk. 66. Hambley v. Trott, Cowp. 373, and 1 vol. Const, edit, of Bott's Poor Laws, 520. ( () See......
-
Maharaj v Beharrysingh
... ... [benefit] of any easement over the servient tenement and would be able to commence an action against anyone interfering with its right to enjoyment of same. At one point in her evidence Sita Maharaj ... ...
-
Wentworth and Another against Cock, Administrator of S. Cock
...instruct an apprentice in his trade, " though it sounds as a personal act;" Com. Dig., Administration (B, 14), referring to Walker v. Hull (1 Lev. 177), where it was said by the Court, on a motion to arrest judgment, that the master's covenant obliged his executors also, "and they ought to ......
-
Abbot v Weekly, at Oxford
...E.R. 357" class="content__heading content__heading--depth1"> English Reports Citation: 83 E.R. 357 COURT OF KING'S BENCH Abbot against Weekly, at Oxford Followed, Hall v. Nottingham, 1875, 1 Ex. D. 3. Referred to, Mercer v. Denne [1904], 2 Ch. 552; [1905], 2 Ch. 538. 1 LEV. 177. HILL. 17 AN......
Request a trial to view additional results