Walker v Stones
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 2000 |
Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
19 cases
-
Daley (Rudolph) v RBTT Bank Jamaica Ltd Etal Walters v Rudolph Daley, RBYY Bank Jamaica Ltd, Harley Corporation Guarantee Trust Company Ltd Harley Corporation Guarantee Trust Company Ltd v Etal Walters; Etal Walters v Rudolph Walters and RBYY Bank Jamaica Ltd [Consolidated Suits]
...and honest people. This has been termed the "Robin Hood test" and has been rejected by the courts. As Sir Christopher Slade stated in Wakker v Stones [2001] QB 902 . 939: "A person may in some cases act dishonestly, according to the ordinary use of language, even though he genuinely believ......
-
John Corbitt Barnsley and Others v Philip Noble
... ... 286 Mr Tager referred me to Walker v Stones [2001] QB 902 where the Court of Appeal was concerned with an exoneration clause in a trust deed in very similar terms to that in clause ... ...
-
Robert Sofer v SwissIndependent Trustees SA
...trust, and hence may be protected by an appropriately drawn exoneration clause. 45 This position was glossed by the Court of Appeal in Walker v Stones [2001] QB 902. There a trust contained an exoneration clause which, so far as material, provided as follows: “15(1)(a) In the professed exe......
-
Madoff Securities International Ltd ((in Liquidation)) v Stephen Raven and Others
...believe was in the interests of the beneficiaries". Drawing on the analysis of Rattee J and the Court of Appeal in Walker v Stones [2001] QB 902, he summarised the position as follows at [81] "……what is required to show dishonesty in the case of a professional trustee is: i) A deliberate b......
Request a trial to view additional results