Walsh v Lonsdale

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1882
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
164 cases
5 books & journal articles
  • Osborne v Estate of Osborne: an equitable agreement or a contract in law: merely a matter of nomenclature?
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 27 No. 1, April 2003
    • 1 April 2003
    ...(1995) 14 WAR 35, 39 (Master Adams). (139) Osborne v Osborne [2000] VSC 95 (Unreported, Harper J, 23 March 2000) [4]-[6], [23]. (140) (1882) 21 ChD 9. Under this doctrine, equity will enforce an agreement for a lease even though the formalities for the creation of a lease have not been met ......
  • Estoppel in land law
    • Caribbean Community
    • Caribbean Law Review No. 3-2, December 1993
    • 1 December 1993
    ...tenancy and a co-existing equitable lease. It is generally said that a court will look only to the equitable lease: Walsh v. Lonsdale (1882) 21 Ch. D.9. Yet bring a purchaser into the picture and everything changes. The purchaser might not be bound by the equitable lease and yet quite clear......
  • The nature of Torrens indefeasibility: understanding the limits of personal equities.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 33 No. 1, April 2009
    • 1 April 2009
    ...(43) Ibid. (44) Oh Hiam v Tham Kong (1980) 2 BPR 9451, 9454 (Lord Russell for Lords Wilberforce, Diplock, Russell, Keith and Lane). (45) (1882) 21 Ch D 9. (46) Bunny Industries Ltd v FSW Enterprises Pty Ltd [1982] Qd R 712, 715 (Connolly J), although the case of Walsh v Lonsdale itself was ......
  • Acquiring Property Rights from Uncompleted Sales of Lane
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review No. 61-4, July 1998
    • 1 July 1998
    ...for life, remainder to her son absolutely. Mrs Oughtred andher son entered into an oral agreement under which he agreed to give up his2 (1882) 21 ChD 9.3May vBelleville [1905] 2 Ch 605.4National Provincial and Union Bank of England vCharnley [1924] 1 KB 431, 440.5 See, eg, in relation to th......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT