Warner v Verfides (A Firm)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date29 October 2008
Date29 October 2008
CourtChancery Division

Chancery Division

Before Mr John Martin, QC

Warner
and
Verfides (a Firm)
Documents after delivery

Documents created by one party and sent to another did not necessarily cease to be correspondence, to which the privacy provisions of article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights could apply, when they were received by the latter.

Mr John Martin, QC, sitting as a deputy Chancery Division judge, so held when, inter alia, determining how the costs of two interveners, Benno Hafner and Hafner and Hochstrasser, a firm, were to be borne in an application by Anthony John Warner, trustee in bankruptcy of the late Rene Rivkin, under article 21(1)(d) of the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross Border Insolvency, as scheduled to the Cross Border Insolvency Regulations (SI 2006 No 1030), for disclosure of documents by the respondent, Verfides, formerly Fortis Intertrust Ltd.

In the event, only a few documents were affected and were excluded by the judge on the ground of irrelevance rather than confidentiality. The only issue affecting the interveners was how their costs were to be borne. That raised the question, inter alia, whether they had had a sufficient interest to intervene at all.

Mr Stephen Davies, QC and Mr Setfan Rowel for the trustee; Mr Piers Gardner, Mr Ian Rogers and Miss Carolyn Walton for the interveners; Verfides was not represented.

HIS LORDSHIP said that to construe "correspondence" as applying only to letters still in the possession...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 firm's commentaries
  • Telecommunications Predictions, TMT Trends 2009 - Part One
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 22 January 2009
    ...27 October Interim CIOs are on the rise, CIO.com, 17 July Garda chief asks mobile phone chief to retain Web browsing data, Irish Times, 6 November 2008; Examples of retention rules in different countries, ICT regulation toolkit, ITU: http://www.ictregulationtoolkit.org/en/PracticeNote.2117.......
15 books & journal articles
  • Ely at the altar: political process theory through the lens of the marriage debate.
    • United States
    • Michigan Law Review Vol. 109 No. 8, June 2011
    • 1 June 2011
    ...09ballots.html; Jesse McKinley & Laurie Goodstein, Bans in 3 States On Gay Marriage, N.Y. TIMES, Nov. 6, 2008, at A1, available at http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/06/us/politics/ (199.) See Barbara S. Gamble, Putting Civil Rights to a Popular Vote, 41 AM. J. POL. SCI. 245, 253, 257-60 (1......
  • Lochner, Lawrence, and Liberty
    • United States
    • Georgia State University College of Law Georgia State Law Reviews No. 27-3, March 2011
    • Invalid date
    ...language and effect of the constitutional amendment). 61. Jesse McKinley & Laurie Goodstein, Bans in 3 States on Gay Marriage, N.Y. Times, Nov. 6, 2008, at A1-3, available at http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/06/us/politics/marriage.html7_r =1&scp=6&sq=%22gay+marriage%22+and+california&st=nyt.......
  • How state supreme courts take consequences into account: toward a state-centered understanding of state constitutionalism.
    • United States
    • Stanford Law Review Vol. 62 No. 6, June 2010
    • 1 June 2010
    ...Cases, 183 P.3d 384, 398 n.2 (Cal. 2008). (326.) Jesse McKinley & Laurie Goodstein, Bans in Three States on Gay Marriage, N.Y. TIMES, Nov. 6, 2008, at (327.) Keck, supra note 14, at 165. (328.) Jeremy W. Peters, New York Backs Same-Sex Unions from Elsewhere, N.Y. TIMES, May 29, 2008, at......
  • Butchering Statutes: the Postville Raid and the Misinterpretation of Federal Criminal Law
    • United States
    • Seattle University School of Law Seattle University Law Review No. 32-03, March 2009
    • Invalid date
    ...DES MOINES REG., Jan. 17, 2009, at Bl. 234. Julia Preston, Large Iowa Meatpacker in Illegal Immigrant Raid Files for Bankruptcy, N.Y. TIMES, Nov. 6, 2008, at 235. Bankruptcy Case Sent to Dubuque, DUBUQUE TELEGRAPH HERALD, Dec. 13, 2008, at A3; see also In re Agriprocessors, Inc., Case No. 0......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT