Warren qui tam, Company against Sayre
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1796 |
| Date | 01 January 1796 |
| Court | High Court |
English Reports Citation: 86 E.R. 821
IN THE COURTS OF KING'S BENCH, CHANCERY, COMMON PLEAS AND EXCHEQUER.
case 23. warren qui tarn, &c. against sayre. Information may be brought on 23 Eliz. c. 1.-Cro. Eliz. 750. Cro. Jac. 142. 2 Leon. 5. Allen, 49. 2 Show. 237, 340. 8 Mod. 43,'381. 11 Mod. 114. 2 Stra. 843, 1066, 1193. 1 Stra. 602. 2 Hale, 165. 2 Hawk. P. C. 358. The Court agreed in this case, that an information for not coming to church may be brought upon the statute of 23 Eliz. c. 1, s. 5, only, reciting the clause in it that has reference to the 1 Eliz. c. 2 ; and that this is the best and surest way of declaring. hilary term. The Twenty-Sixth and Twenty-Seventh of Charles the Second. In the Common Pleas. Sir Francis North, Knt., Chief Justice, Sir Robert Atkins, Knt., Sir Hugh Wyndham, Knt., Sir William Ellis, Knt., Justices. Sir William Jones, Knt., Attorney General. Sir Francis Wilmington, Knt...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
R v Houston
...134. Andrews v. Hundred of LewknorENR Cro. Jac. 187. Horthbury v. LevinghamENR 1 Sid. 348. Parker v. WebbENR 3 Lev. 61. Warren v. SayreENR 1 Mod. 191. Rex v. PimENR Russ. & Ry. 425. Rex v. ChatburnENR 1 Mood. c. C. 403. Regina v. Houston 2 Cr. & Dix. Cir. C. 10. Broughton v. MooreENR Cro. J......
-
Howell against King
...OF KING'S BENCH, CHANCERY, COMMON PLEAS AND EXCHEQUER.Howell against King See Finch v. Great Western Railway Company, 1879, 5 Ex. D. 258. 1 MOD. 191. HILARY TERM, 26 AND 27 CAR. 2. IN C. B. 821 case 22. howell against king. [See Fineh v. Great Western Railway Company, 1879, 5 Ex. D. 258.] I......