Waters v Waters
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1956 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Gollins v Gollins
...has been satisfactorily mitigated by the Court of Appeal in Wright v. Wright [1960] P. 85, and in other respects the reasoning in Waters v. Waters [1956] P. 344 has avoided some of the difficulties caused by 100In Kaslefsky's case the Court apparently considered that the use of the word "......
-
Gollins v Gollins
...The Justices, it is said, directed themselves solely in accordance with the decision of the Divisional Court in Waters v. Waters, (1956) Probate, 344, without recognising that the relevant test in that case was not a test of universal application. The case of Kaslefsky v. Kaslefsky, (1951)......
-
Scott v Scott
...350;Kaslefsky v. KaslefskyELR, [1951] P. 38; Simpson v. SimpsonELR, [1951] P. 320; Forbes v. ForbesELR,[1956] P. 16; Waters v. WatersELR, [1956] P. 344. 7 Reference was made to M'Donald v. M'DonaldSC, 1939 S. C. 8 Reference was made to Dobbie v. DobbieSC, 1955 S. C. 371; Swan v. SwanELR, [1......
-
Waite v Waite
...P. 51 8 [1954] P. 403 9 Brown v. Brown, supra 10 Reference was made to Jamieson v. Jamieson,supra 11 [1951] P. 38 12 [1960] P. 85 13 [1956] P. 344 14 Buchler, [1947] P. 25 15 Reference was made to Waters v. WatersELR, [1956] P. 344; Hutchison v. HutchisonSC, 1945 S. C. 427;Crawford v. Crawf......
Request a trial to view additional results