Watkin v Hall
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1865 |
| Court | Court of the Queen's Bench |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
17 cases
- Abdul Khalid @ Khalid Jafri bin Bakar Shah v Party Islamse Malaysia and Others
-
Ganley v RTE
...as opposed to the innuendo relied upon which I have set out earlier in this judgment. Brembridge...was considered by Blackburn J. in Watkin v. Hall (1868) LR 3 QB 396, 402. This was a slander action, the facts of which are unimportant. The court was concerned with the pleadings, and Blackb......
-
Grubb v Bristol United Press Ltd
...be proved against them at the trial. 21 The 1852 Act elevated the status of the innuendo, so that it became a separate cause of action. Watkin v. Hall, 3 Queen's Bench, 396, and per Lord Atkin in Sim. v. Stretch, 52 Times Law Reports, 669. In the former case, at page 401, Mr Justice Blackbu......
-
Lewis v Daily Telegraph Ltd; Rubber Improvement Ltd v Daily Telegraph Ltd; Rubber Improvement Ltd v Associated Newspapers Ltd
... ... (See Sim v. Stretch F28 and Watkin v. Hall. F29 ... Unless the court otherwise permits, any payment into court referable to an innuendo must be a separate payment ... The words of the ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Justification
...justify by proving the fact of the murder." Douglas v. Tucker, [1952] S.C.R. 275, per Cartwright J at 285, citing Watkin v. Hall (1868), L.R. 3 Q.B. 396, where Blackburn J. explains the rationale for this principle at 401: As great an injury may accrue from the wrongful repetition as from t......