Watkins v Hybert
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1790 |
| Date | 01 January 1790 |
| Court | Court of the King's Bench |
English Reports Citation: 96 E.R. 799
COURT OF KING'S BENCH
Watkins
and
ers. Hybert
W atkins vers. hybert. The changing of the venue from an English to a Welch county refused. A motion was made to change the venue, in an action of assault and battery, from the county of Middlesex to the county of Brecknock. The Court refused to make a rule to shew cause. And by Lee Ch.J.-It has been said; that rule, for changing the venue from an English to a Welch county, was made in the case of Price v. Griffith...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
43 cases
-
Erskine v Goel
...whether this was so or not. They observed (p. 39 of the record) that, “it is doubtful if any draft existed.” But the judgment went on to say (p. 48): “In our view the moment the appellant agreed to purchase U.S. currency and ‘attempted’ to do so in the circumstances herein, and had the expe......
-
Ancorde Ltd & Barry Harte v Horgan and Others
...with the provision of the Loan Agreement referred to earlier, it would be deemed to be received 48 hours after its posting, that is to say, 48 hours after 5.20pm on 15 th November, 2012. However, the date which was inserted in the stock transfer form, 16 th November, 2012, occurred before t......
-
R. v. Shalala (R.), (1998) 198 N.B.R.(2d) 298 (TD)
...fish.' Or-- STEPHEN: Mm-hmm. JIM: --or whatever it is, what are you fishing? Stuff like that. You could do that, use it in thousands. If you say 48 thousand, I'll know you need 48. Okay. I'm gonna wolf this down and we'll get the fuck out of here. Uh--" [107] In a telephone interception tap......
-
Todd Aaron Marteley v The Legal Services Commissioner
...encompassed within s 385 of the Crimes Act 1961 or other relevant provisions would be ritualistic. [30] The Chief Justice later went on to say:48 As noted in the introductory section of this judgment the formal procedure requires the identification of an arguable ground of appeal, this bein......
Get Started for Free
3 firm's commentaries
-
Gold Dome Report - March 2019 #2
...counties have more in their jails with minor offenses and many cannot afford bail in those cases. Sometimes courts do not meet daily; it does say 48 hours before a judge but does not say what exactly is to happen. Her fear is that it is Jill Travis, Georgia Association of Criminal Defense L......
-
Incursion And World Trade, Part 3: Over 120+ Days Into The Global Effect Of Inevitable Food Insecurity
...included as it makes it hard to actually pay for their goods) "Next-level," meaning, the blockade at the main port is eliminated in let's say 48 hours, via Ukraine, but with highly upgraded equipment from the U.S. even beyond the current long range missile delivery. Yes, the Biden administr......
-
Timely Shipping in the Age of COVID-19
...“overnight shipping”) and to unspecific statements such as “fast shipping.” According to the FTC if you represent that you ship in, let’s say, 48 hours “most of the time,” you will be required to ship in 48 hours all of the time (or you will have to send a delay notice). It is critical that......
3 books & journal articles
-
Piercing the veil of informant confidentiality: the role of in camera hearings in the Roviaro determination.
...the privilege only if she can make what is essentially an impossible showing: prove that the informant will have something material to say. (48) This Note argues that this narrow interpretation of Roviaro exception to the privilege insulates the informant-handler relationship, undermines th......
-
Sub-bailment
...that sub-bailment apply to a bailor, even those it may not have speciic awareness of? The answer would seem to sometimes be “no.” That is to say, 48 The absence of these things was not a bar to inding a sub-bailment to have existed between the plaintif (bailor) and the sub-bailee (CN) in th......
-
Ethically Speaking
...Justice Golden: There is, perhaps, some common sense in the old adage which we have in the West that a defeated litigant has 24 hours (some say 48) to ‘cuss’ the court, but he must ‘shut up’ thereafter. It is a crude compromise between freedom of speech and, if we want to keep on being civi......
9 provisions
-
Ilford Corporation (Drainage) Act 1950
...Act 1936 hereinafter nenlioned sha!i have effect as if they were re-enacted in this Act and in terms made applicable thereto (that is to say):- 48 14 GEO. 6 Ilford Corporcition (Draiizage) Act, 1959 Ch. Ixi Section 275 Section 276 Section 277 Section 279 Section 283 Section 284 Section 285 ......
-
Aberdeen Corporation Act 1891
...pounds for paying off or redeeming statutory securities granted by the Corporation under the following Acts and now outstanding (that is to say): 48 [54 & 55 Vict.] Aberdeen Corporation Act, 1891. [Cb. CXXiv.] E. For the purpose of issuing stock in substitution for statutory securities A.D.......
-
Halifax Corporation Act 1902
...and a1)ply mutatis mutandis of Act of to and in relation to tlie lands by this Act authorised to be 1~0'as to acquired (tliat is to say) :- -- 48. The jury arhitmtors uinpire or other authority to whom costs of lauds. Section 57 (I'eriod for compulsory purcliase of' lands.) ,, 58 (Persons e......
-
North British Railway Act 1885
...first parties") nd the North British Railway Company incorporated by Act of Parliament of the second part in manner following (that is to say) : 48 [48 & 49 Vict.] North British Railway Act, 1885. [Ch. CXix.] FirstThe first parties so far as they are concerned hereby agree to the A.D. 1885,......
Get Started for Free