Watson v England
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 22 February 1844 |
| Date | 22 February 1844 |
| Court | High Court of Chancery |
English Reports Citation: 60 E.R. 266
HIGH COURT OF CHANCERY
Watson
and
England
S. C. 8 Jur. 1062.
Evidence. Presumption of Death.
[28] watson v. england. Feb. 22, 1844. [S. C. 8 Jur. 1062.] Evidence. Presumption of Death. A person ought not to be presumed to be dead from the fact of his not having been heard of for seven years, if the other circumstances of the case render it probable that he would not be heard of though alive. The old law relating to the presumption of death is daily becoming more and more untenable in consequence of the increased facility of travelling. The decree in this cause directed the Master to inquire and state whether Mary Bilton was living or dead, and, if dead, when she died, &c...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
4 cases
- K Janagi; R Muthu Thambi
-
Re Wong Sook Mun Christina
...(refd) Surjit Kaur v Jhujhar SinghAIR 1980 P & H 274 (refd) Watkins, Re, Watkins v Watkins [1953] 2 All ER 1112 (refd) Watson v England (1844) 14 Sim 28; 60 ER 266 (refd) William Lancelot Walker, In the Estate of [1909] P 115 (refd) Evidence Act (Cap 97,1997 Rev Ed)ss 109, 110 (consd);ss 93......
-
M'Mahon and Others v M'Elroy
...Sim. 443. Hughes v. Garner 2 Y. & C. Exch. Rep. 328. Hardy v. Reeves 5 Ves. 426. 426. Smith v. KayENR 7 H. L. C. 750. Watson v. EnglandENR 14 Sim. 28. Dowley v. WinfieldENR 14 Sim. 277. Bowden v. Henderson 2 Sm. & Gif. 360. Gerrard v. O'Reilly 3 Dr. & War. 414. Jones v. SmithENR 1 Hare, 43.......
-
The Estate of Samuel Henry Webb, Owner; ex parte George Percy Elliott and Charles Thomas Holcombe, Petitioners
...OWNER; EX PARTE GEORGE PERCY ELLIOTT AND CHARLES THOMAS HOLCOMBE, PETITIONERS Banning v. GriffinENR 15 East, 293. Watson v. EnglandENR 14 Sim. 28. France v. Andrews 15 Q. B. 756. In the Goods of SmithENR 2 Sw. & Tr. 508. In the Goods of TurnerENR 2 Sw. & Tr. 476. Landed Estates Court — Pres......