Watts v Watts
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 17 December 1859 |
| Date | 17 December 1859 |
| Court | High Court of Chancery |
English Reports Citation: 70 E.R. 572
HIGH COURT OF CHANCERY
Practice. Revivor.
[631] watts v. watts. Dec. 17, 1859. Practice. Bevivor. Plaintiff was tenant for life, with contingent remainders to his children, with remainder to a Defendant for life, with contingent remainder to his first son who should attain twenty-one and survive him. After bill filed and before decree the Defendant's eldest son was born. After decree Plaintiff died without having had any issue. On an application on behalf of the infant son of the Defendant for a revivor order: Held, that a bill in the nature of a bill of supplement and revivor was necessary. This was a suit for the administration of a will of real and personal property. The estates were limited to the Plaintiff, J. W. Watts,''for life, remainder in fee to his first or only son who should attain twenty-one and survive his [632] father, with a contingent limitation in default of such son to C. H. Watts for life, remainder in fee to his first or only son who should attain twenty-one and survive his father. The Plaintiff filed his bill in 1854, making C. H. Watts and the trustees of the will Defendants. In March 1856 the first son of C. H. Watts was born. In...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Howard v Howard
...45 L. J. C. P. 417. Chorlton v. Dickie 13 Ch. Div. 160. Van Gelder Assurance v. Sowerby Flour Society 44 Ch. Div. 374. Watts v. WattsENR Johns. 631. Ebrard v. Gassier 28 Ch. Div. 232. Eyre v. BaldwinUNK 4 Ir. C. L. R. 270. Palmer v. Ashbrook 4 Ir. Jur. (O. S.) 193. Gledhill v. Hunter 14 Ch.......
-
Cupples v Strahan
...S.) 349. Jones v. Simes 43 Ch. Div. 607. Kirk v. Todd 21 Ch. Div. 484. Van Gelder v. Sowerby Bridge Co. 44 Ch. Div. 374. Watts & WattsENR Johnson, 631. Hills v. SpringettELR L. R. 5 Eq. 123. Claparede v. Commercial Union Association 32 W. R. 151. Tildesley v. Harper 10 Ch. Div. 393. Walcott......
-
REMOTE JUSTICE: CONFRONTING THE USE OF VIDEO TELECONFERENCE TESTIMONY IN MASSACHUSETTS CRIMINAL TRIALS.
...586, 589-590 (Mass. 1989) (finding no violation of art. 12 where the defendant could have seen child witness by bending slightly). (150.) Johnson, 631 N.E.2d. at 1006; accord Coy v. Iowa, 487 U.S. 1012, 1019 (151.) Commonwealth v. Bergstrom, 524 N.E.2d. 366, 377 (Mass. 1988). (152.) See, e.......