Weinberger v Inglis
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1918 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
31 cases
-
Allied Irish Banks Plc v AIG Euope Ltd
...underlying rationale. In my view, a more satisfactory explanation is to be found in the judgment of Astbury J. in Weinberger v. Inglis [1918] 1 Ch. 133. That case arose during the currency of the First World War. The plaintiff (who had been born in Germany) applied to become a member of th......
-
Nagle v Feilden
...(1759) 2 Burrow, p. 292. 10 There are not many modem cases on the subject, but they support the principle which I have stated. In Weinberger v. Inglisy, 1919 Appeal Cases, p. 606, the rules of the Stock Exchange gave to the Committee an absolute discretion to admit such persons as they "sha......
- Adams v Yung
-
Stapeley v Annetts
...and probable cause for what he did". I am afraid that was an error. No such particulars are ordered in malicious prosecution. 5 In Weinberger v. Inglis (1918 1 Ch. 133) Mr. Justice Astbury said: "As a general rule the Court never orders a defendant to jive particulars of facts and matters w......
Request a trial to view additional results