Wellington
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1991 |
| Year | 1991 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
R v Matthews (Darren John); R v Alleyne (Brian Dean)
...doubt" basis, viz that this court should "feel a reasoned and substantial unease about the finding of guilt" ( R v. Wellington (1991) Crim L R 543). We consider that ground in circumstances where, as stated above, we think that on the prosecution's concession that the judge's form of Nedric......
-
Queen v Charles Malachy Oliver Pollock
...7 Archbold News 2, Ct-MAC, it was said that the "lurking doubt" test, and an alternative formulation advanced in R. v. Wellington [1991] Crim.L.R. 543, CA ("whether we feel a reasoned and substantial unease about the finding of guilt"), are both acceptable and come to the same thing, ‘Was t......
-
R v Paul Bond
...to the safety of the conviction. We think the same is true if one applies the question posed in the more recent case of R v Wellington [1991] Crim.L.R 543, referred to at Archbold in its current edition paragraph 7-49, page 1139, where the test was said to be "Whether we feel a reasoned and......
-
XY v R
...v. LakeUNK(1976), 64 Cr. App. R. 172, considered. (4) R. v. WallaceUNK(1978), 67 Cr. App. R. 291, considered. (5) R. v. Wellington, [1991] Crim. L.R. 543, considered. Legislation construed: Court of Appeal Law (2006 Revision), s.9(1)(a): The relevant terms of this paragraph are set out at p......
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
.... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .120, 128R v Wanhalla [2006] NZCA 229. . . . . . . . . 62, 237R v Wellington [1991] Crim LR 543. . . . . . . . . . 64R v Williams [2002] EWCA Crim 2208 . . . . . 120,127, 128, 130R v Young [1995] QB 324. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......
-
Noticeboard
...this with a more objective test, namely ‘whether wefeel a reasoned and substantial unease about the finding of guilt’ (RvWellington[1991] Crim LR 543). In RvBenton, unreported, 24 February 2000, CA, the subjectiveand objective tests were treated as interchangeable. Some consolation is to be......