Wershof v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1978 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 cases
-
Dexter Smith v 1) Attorney General 2) Commissioner of Police 3) Corporal Portia Nicholas 4) Sergeant Samuel Smart
...ER 1 Glinski v Mc Iver [1962] 2 WLR 832 Bradshaw v WaterIow & Sons Ltd. [1915] 3 K.B 527 Weishof v Metropolitan Police Commissioner [1978] 3 All ER 540 Hicks v Faulknes [1878] 8 Q.B.D 167 Ted Alexis v AG of Trinidad & Tobago —High Court Appeal No. S-1555 of 2002 (unreported) Ortiz (Jose) ......
-
Sutton v Commissioner of the Police for the Metropolis
...to the words used, which for the most part follow what was said by May J. in Wershof v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis (1978) 3 All E R 540. Mr Wood submits that the jury should have been told that the obstruction must be physical. That, as it seems to me, goes too far. In Rickett......
-
Smith v Attorney General, Commission of Police, Ncholas and Smart
...v. Mc Iver [1962] 2 W.L.R. 832 Bradshaw v. Waterlow & Sons Ltd. [1915] 3 K.B. 527 Weishof v. Metropolitan Police Commissioner [1978] 3 All E.R. 540 Hicks v. Faulknes (1878) 8 Q.B.D 167 Ted Alexis v. AG of Trinidad and Tobago — High Court Appeal No. s-1555 of 2002 (unreported) Ortiz (Jos......
-
Williamson v Attorney General
...cause and the presence of malice. Having one without the other will not suffice: Wershof v. Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [1978] 3 All E.R. 540. Reasonable and Probable Cause 16 Reasonable and probable cause was defined by Hawkins, J. in the landmark case Hicks v. Faulkner [1881......
Request a trial to view additional results