Wheeler v United Telephone Company

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1884
Year1884
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
9 cases
  • McEvoy ll v King
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • December 21, 1943
    ...O'Byrne and Black JJ.) that judgment should be entered for the defendant and the action dismissed. Wheeler v. United Telephone Co., 13 Q. B. D. 597, and Goutard v. Carr,13 Q. B. D. 598, applied. Held further (Sullivan C.J., O'Byrne and Black JJ.; Murnaghan J. dissenting) that the defendant ......
  • Campbell v M'Clelland
    • Ireland
    • Common Pleas Division (Ireland)
    • April 16, 1886
    ...6 L. R. Ir. 405. Martin v. BannisterELR 4 Q. B. D. 491. Kearney v. HannonUNK 10 L. R. Ir. 17. Wheeler v. The United Telephone Co.ELR 13 Q. B. D. 597. Goutard v. Carr Ibid. 598, note. Nichols v. EvansELR 22 Ch. D. 611. M' Ilwraith v. GreenELR 14 Q. B. D. 766. Kelly v. SlaterUNK 7 Ir. C. L. R......
  • Harrington v Staude
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • January 1, 1960
    ...487. (3) [1922] 1 I. R. 110. (1) (1864) 10 Ir. Jur. N. S. 335. (2) I. R. 4 C. L. 388. (3) [1946] I. R. 236. (4) [1930] I. R. 182. (5) 13 Q. B. D. 597. (1) [1943] I. R. ...
  • Campbell v M'Clelland O'Donnell v Callanan
    • Ireland
    • Chancery Division (Ireland)
    • June 8, 1886
    ...P. Div. Ex. Div. Appeal. CAMPBELL and M'CLELLAND O'DONNELL and CALLANAN. Wheeler v. The United Telephone Co.ELR 13 Q. B. D. 597. Spurr v. HallELR 2 Q. B. D. 615. Berdan v. GreenwoodELR 3 Ex. D. 251. Coughlan v. MorrisUNK 6 L. R. Ir. 405. Hawkesley v. BradshawELR 5 Q. B. D. 302. Costellow v.......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT