Whistler v Hancock
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1877 |
| Year | 1877 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
36 cases
-
Samuels v Linzi Dresses Ltd
...against the views expressed by Judge Fay and Judge Hawser, lies in a decision of the Divisional Court, oft-quoted and oft criticised, Whistler -v- Hancock, (1878) 3 Queen's Bench Division, page 83, a case decided over 100 years ago on the 11th January 1878. 10 The Divisional Court consisted......
- Shaik Ali v Shaik Mohamed
-
BDC Ltd v D.E. Mortimer Ltd 1995 Civil Jur. No. 493
... ... Hitachi Sales (UK) Ltd. v Mitsui Osk Lines Ltd.UNK [1986] 2 Lloyds Rep. 574 Whistler v HancockELR (1878) 3 QBD 83 Samuels v Linzi Dresses Ltd.ELR [1981] QB 115 Order for documents to be ... Mr. Diel argues that I have no power to do so, relying on the old case of Whistler -v- Hancock(1878) 3 QBD 83. That case and the consequences that flowed from it are set out in the note to the 1979 White Book at 3/5/5, where it is stated ... ...
-
Select Holdings Ltd v Petroleum Coporation of Jamaica Ltd
...of Roskill LJ in Samuels v Linzi Dresses Ltd. [1980] 1 All ER 803. The first reads thus at page 808: "Lord Selborne LC described Whistler v Hancock (1878) 3 QDB 83 and Wallis v Hepburn (1878) 3 QBD 84as very different from the instant case. He said in Carter v Stubbs 6 QBD 116 at 118: 'In......
Request a trial to view additional results