White v Proudlock (Note)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1988 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
- Webb v DPP
- Davis v DPP
-
Steadman v DPP
...himself, and that decision has to be based "[O]n the facts known to [him] … at the time" (see Robert Goff LJ (as he then was) in White v Proudlock [1988] RTR 163 at p. 170F) and bearing in mind that the police officer "is to be treated as a layman in medical matters" (see Neill LJ in Davies......
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...Whelehan v DPP [1995] RTR 177, DC! 15 ......................................... White & Gaskell v Proudlock [1988] RTR 163, DC! 26 , 553 ....................................................................... White, DPP v [1988] RTR 267, DC! 513 ...................................................
-
The Requirement to Provide Specimens
...why it was not practicable to use it.” Appeal dismissed. 25 CHAPTER 1: THE REQUIREMENT TO PROVIDE SPECIMENS White & Gaskell v Proudlock [1988] RTR 163, 23 November 1984, QBD (DC) Having reasonable cause to believe that for medical reasons breath specimens cannot be provided or should not be......