Whitehead v Haines
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1964 |
| Date | 1964 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Royal Mail Group Ltd v Richard Watson
...ii) Here, the facts can rebut the presumption and thus the acquittal can be upheld on that basis (even if not argued below – see Whitehead v Haines [1965] 1 QB 200 (“ Whitehead”); iii) Anyone who exercises permission to enter another's property can become a trespasser if they act recklessl......
-
London Borough of Newham v Ahmed
...Judge but was not, and the respondents contend that it is too late to do so now. 25 In this connection, we were referred to the case of Whitehead v Haines [1965] 1 QB 200 and, in particular, of the judgment of Winn J at page 209 D to E, where he stated as follows: "In my judgment, it would ......
-
Lycamobile UK v London Borough of Waltham Forest
...of an conviction. 15 To deal with the fact that this point was not even raised before the magistrates, Mr de Haan submits, relying on Whitehead v Haines [1965] 1 QB 200, that on an appeal by way of case stated the High Court can and should entertain and determine a pure point of law which m......
-
S v DPP
...my judgment, all that presents the appellant with insuperable procedural difficulties. 7 Miss Sikand seeks to rely on Whitehead v Haines [1965] 1 QB 200, and in particular a passage in the judgment of Winn J at page 209. However, that authority does not deal with the position where an appel......
2 books & journal articles
-
Divisional Court
...asked to intervene to correct that error, even though the point hadnot been noticed before the appeal was heard: see Whitehead v Haines[1965] 1 QB 200, where it was said that it would not be right for the courtto decline to take a point of law which was open on the facts found in thecase, m......
-
In the Irish Courts
...set out,andwas right inconcludingthatit wasnotof a like kind to any oftheothers: see INTHEIRISHCOURTS 163Whitehead v. Haines (1965, 1 Q.B. 200, 211).Thecourt declinedto accept the prosecutor's argument that, in order to suppress themischief aimed at, it should not look at each of the named ......