Whittaker v Campbell

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1983
Year1983
CourtDivisional Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 cases
  • Singh v Rathour
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 14 October 1987
    ...indemnified by his personal insurers, the third party. 14 For the appellant, however, Mr. Slowe directed our attention to the case of Whittaker v. Campbell [1984] 1 Q.B.318, a decision of the Divisional Court presided over by Goff L.J. That was not a civil claim under an insurance policy in......
  • Shogun Finance Ltd v Hudson
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 19 November 2003
    ...fraud does not have the consequence of negativing the formation of a contract. 7 Similarly with consent: as noted by Robert Goff LJ in Whittaker v Campbell [1984] QB 318, 327, in this context fraud does not 'vitiate' consent. Professor Glanville Williams rightly said that the maxim 'fraud v......
  • Food Corporation of India v Antclizo Shipping Corporation (Antclizo)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 5 May 1988
  • Food Corporation of India v Antclizo Shipping Corporation (Antclizo)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 7 April 1987
    ...in the manner contemplated by the offer, and cannot thereafter be revoked without the consent of the other party." 55 Likewise in Whittaker v. Campbell (1984) Queen's Bench 318, at 326. Again, in McCutcheon v. David Macbrayne Ltd (1964) Lloyd's Law Reports 16, 21, Lord Reid quoted with appr......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT