Whittaker v Campbell
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1983 |
| Year | 1983 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
Singh v Rathour
...indemnified by his personal insurers, the third party. 14 For the appellant, however, Mr. Slowe directed our attention to the case of Whittaker v. Campbell [1984] 1 Q.B.318, a decision of the Divisional Court presided over by Goff L.J. That was not a civil claim under an insurance policy in......
-
Food Corporation of India v Antclizo Shipping Corporation (Antclizo)
...in the manner contemplated by the offer, and cannot thereafter be revoked without the consent of the other party." 55 Likewise in Whittaker v. Campbell (1984) Queen's Bench 318, at 326. Again, in McCutcheon v. David Macbrayne Ltd (1964) Lloyd's Law Reports 16, 21, Lord Reid quoted with appr......
- Food Corporation of India v Antclizo Shipping Corporation (Antclizo)
-
Sheikh Tahnoon Bin Saeed Bin Shakhboot Al Nehayan v Ioannis Kent (Aka John Kent)
...to allow the other party to enforce the agreement. Just as – contrary to what is often said – fraud does not vitiate consent (see Whittaker v Campbell [1984] QB 318), nor does duress. As Lord Scarman stated in The Universe Sentinel [1983] 1 AC 366, 400: “Compulsion is variously described i......
Request a trial to view additional results