Whittaker v Campbell

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtDivisional Court
Year1983
Date1983

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
6 cases
  • Singh v Rathour
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 14 October 1987
    ...be no cover provided, even though the owner would have given his consent in accordance with the provisions of section 12(6)Whittaker v. Campbell [1984] 1 Q.B.318, a decision of the Divisional Court presided over by Goff L.J. That was not a civil claim under an insurance policy in circumstan......
  • Food Corporation of India v Antclizo Shipping Corporation (Antclizo)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 5 May 1988
  • Food Corporation of India v Antclizo Shipping Corporation (Antclizo)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 7 April 1987
    ...in the manner contemplated by the offer, and cannot thereafter be revoked without the consent of the other party." 55 Likewise in Whittaker v. Campbell (1984) Queen's Bench 318, at 326. Again, in McCutcheon v. David Macbrayne Ltd (1964) Lloyd's Law Reports 16, 21, Lord Reid quoted with appr......
  • Fiona Lorraine Philipp v Barclays Bank UK Plc
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 12 July 2023
    ...All ER 377, HL(E) Westpac New Zealand Ltd v MAP and Associates Ltd [2011] NZSC 89; [2011] 3 NZLR 751 Whittaker v Campbell [1984] QB 318; [1983] 3 WLR 676; [1983] 3 All ER 582, The following additional cases were cited in argument: Aegis Resources DMCC v Union Bank of India (DIFC) Branch [20......
  • Get Started for Free