Whittam v W. J. Daniel & Company Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1961
Date1961
Year1961
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
32 cases
  • Singh (Santosh Kumari) v Atombrook Ltd (trading as Sterling Travel)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 17 Junio 1988
    ...something of that kind. That is fanciful and I reject it. The matter is put beyond doubt by a further decision of this court in Whitton v. W.J. Daniel & Co. Ltd., (1962) 1 Queen's Bench 271. In that case a limited company was sued within the limitation period but without adding the word "l......
  • Dumford Trading AG v OAO Atlantrybflot
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 26 Enero 2005
    ...possible to say that the inclusion of the firm on the writ was a mere misnomer for the inclusion of the limited company." 29 In Whittam v. W J Daniel & Co Ltd [1962] 1 QB 271, on very similar facts, the decision went the other way: Davies v. Elsby Brothers was distinguished for the very re......
  • Thew (R & T) Ltd v Reeves
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 6 Mayo 1981
    ...(1723) 2 Peere Williams 151. It has corrected a misnomer or misdescription by giving the right name or the right description, see Whittam v. W. Daniel & Go. Ltd. (1962) 1 Queen's Bench 171. The general principle is that, when the object and intent of a document is obvious—and known to all c......
  • Liberty Mercian Ltd v Cuddy Civil Engineering Ltd (1st Defendant) Cuddy Demolition and Dismantling Ltd (2nd Defendant)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
    • 3 Septiembre 2013
    ...do not allow people to take advantage of a misnomer when everyone knows what was intended. I will only refer to one authority, Whittam v. WJ Daniel & Co. Ltd., [1962] 1 QB 271at p. 277, where Lord Justice Donovan cited the words of Lord Justice Devlin: I think that the test must be: how wo......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • MISNOMER THAT CAN VITIATE PROCEEDINGS
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Sasegbon’s Judicial Dictionary of Nigerian Law. First edition M
    • 6 Febrero 2019
    ...349; Mitchell v. Harris Engineering Co. Ltd. (1967) 2 Q.B. 703, (1967) 2 All E.R. 682, C.A.; Whittam v. W.J. Daniel & Co. Ltd. (1962) 1 Q.B. 271, (1961) 3 All E.R. 796, C.A." - Per Sulu-Gambari, J.C.A., in A.B. Manu & Co. v. Costain (W.A.) Ltd. Suit No. CA/ L/62/92; (1994) 8 N.W.L.R......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT