Wickens v Champion Employment

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Date1984
CourtEmployment Appeal Tribunal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 cases
  • McMeechan v Secretary of State for Employment
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Appeal Tribunal
    • Invalid date
  • McMeechan v Secretary of State for Employment
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 11 December 1996
    ...it was a long term engagement with Parcelforce. 6. Like the Tribunal on 13 August, we have been referred to Wickens v Champion Employment [1984] ICR 365 which was a claim under S 64 A(1) of the Employment Protection (Consolidation) Act 1978 (as it then was). It was necessary in that case to......
  • Bunce v Postworth Ltd trading as Skyblue
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 4 May 2005
    ...to conclude that an individual is an employee simply because he is not a self employed person carrying on a business of his own: Wickens v Champion Employment [1984] ICR 365 at 371 and Ironmonger v Movefield Ltd [1988] IRLR 461 at paragraphs 19–21." I note in passing that those two authorit......
  • Brook Street Bureau (UK) Ltd v Patricia Dacas
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 5 March 2004
    ...is an employee simply because he is not a self employed person carrying on a business of his own: Wickens v. Champion Employment [1984] ICR 365 at 371 and Ironmonger v. Movefield Ltd [1988] IRLR 461 at paragraphs 19–21. 50 The real problem for the tribunals is the application of the basic l......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • 2. The Statutory Floor of Employment Rights: A Bad Case of Subsidence?
    • United Kingdom
    • Employee Relations No. 9-5, May 1987
    • 1 May 1987
    ...the regular casual list. This sort of narrow reasoning is also to be found in the judgment of the EAT in Wickens v. Champion Employment (1984) ICR 365[9] where "temps" engaged by a private employment agency were not accorded employment status because of the lack of binding obligation on the......
  • Agency Workers, Employment Rights and the Ebb and Flow of Freedom of Contract
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review No. 72-1, January 2009
    • 1 January 2009
    ...PersonalEmployment Contract (Oxford:OUP,20 03) ch 1.2 on grounds of lack of mutuality of obligation:Wic kens vChampion Employment[1984]ICR 365.3 See eg A.T. Kronman,‘ContractLaw and Distributive Justice’(1989)Yale LJ 472.r2009 The Authors. Journal Compilation r2009 The Modern LawReview Limi......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT