Widow Stacy's Case
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1662 |
| Date | 01 January 1662 |
| Court | Court of the King's Bench |
English Reports Citation: 82 E.R. 336
King's Bench Division
widow stacy's case. Un fuit indict sur le statute 12 Jac. pur entront en un meason en Cobham, en le county del Oxon, ad tune existens liberum tenementem, tiel feme ad voluntatem domini secundum consuetudinem manerii, &c. Le party vient en le Court, & esteant mits hors de possession sur ceo indictment, per un justice del pace, pria, que le Court granteroit luy restitution, & a luy fuit grant, p Doderidge, & Whitloek, Jones absent. Le reason fuit, quia, lea parols del statute done power al justice del pace, ou un Judge a faire restitution, al lessor pur ans, guardein en chivalry, ou tenant p copy del court roll, ad volunt, &e. Mes p ascun chose icy alleadge, le feme poet estre tenant a volunt p verge, & nemy p copy. Mes le statute ne serra prise p equity. Et pur c cestuy, c^ voet aver restitution sur c statute, doit estre diens les parols le statute. Al auter jour Doderidge, & Whitloek...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Attorney General, at the relation, & v Magdalen College, Oxford
...there was no person, during all the time, entitled to sue within its meaning; Commissioners of Charitable Donations v. Warrants (2 Jon. & Lat. 182); Attorney-General v. Perm (2 Dr. & War. 67); Law v. Bagwell (4 Dr. & War. 398); Incorporated Society v. Richards (1 Dr. & War. 258); Burrell v.......
-
Dickinson v Teasdale
...(page 110 (2d edit.)), and the principles to b gathered from the cases of The Commissioners of Charitable Donations v. Wybrants (2 Jo. & Lat. 182); Hunt v. Bateman (10 Ir. Eq. 360); Dwndas v. Blake (11 Ir. Eq. 138); Young v. Lord Waterpark (13 Sim. 204; S. C. on appeal, 15 L. J. (N. S.) Ch.......
-
Kellett v Kellett
...187. Hunt v. BatemanIR 10 Ir. Eq. 360. Blower v. Blower 5 Eng. Jur. N. S. 33. Commissioners of Charitable Bequests v. WybrantsENR 2 Jo. & Lat. 182. Lassence v. Tierney 1 M'N. & G. 551. Spong v. Spong 3 Bligh. N. S. 34. Conron v. ConronENR 7 H. L. C. 168. Doe v. HicksENR 1 Cl. & Fin. 20. Gre......
-
The Estate of Deane Drake
...amended by section 1 of the Real Property Limitation Act, 1874.) The Commissioners of Charitable Donations and Bequests v. Wybrants (2 J. & Lat. 182) not followed. Hughes v. Coles (27 Ch. D. 231) disapproved of. Question arising on allocation. Urith Paul, a predecessor in title of the vendo......