Willetts v Watt
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1892 |
Year | 1892 |
Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Nimmo (James) & Company v Connell
...upon the dictum of Mr. Justice Stephen in McGiffin v. Palmers' Shipbuilding Co. as wrong. I also agree specially with his criticism of Willetts v. Watt Co., which I think he shows is not really borne out by Lord Lindley's judgment in Walsh v. Whitely. Further, I agree with Lord Shaw in thin......
-
Robertson v kinneil Cannel and Coking Coal Company
...89, [1924] A. C. 595, at p. 603. 9 Cf. Connell v. James Nimmo & Co., 1923 S. C. 737, Lord Sands at p. 744; Willetts v. Watt & Co.ELR, [1892] 2 Q. B. 92, Fry, L.J., at p. 100. 10 1923 S. C. 737, 1924 S. C. (H. L.) 84, [1924] A. C. 595. 11 [1897] 1 Q. B. 502. 12 Glegg on Reparation, (2nd ed.)......
-
Nimmo (James) & Company v Connell
...Shipbuilding and Iron Co.ELR, (1882) 10 Q. B. D. 5; M'Quade v. Wm. Dixon, LimitedSC, (1887) 14 R. 1039; Willetts v. Watt & Co.ELR, [1892] 2 Q. B. 92. 3 (1885) 23 S. L. R. 4 Smith v. BakerELR, [1891] A. C. 325. 5 Mitchell v. Coats Iron and Steel Co.UNK, 23 S. L. R. 108; Ferris v. Cowdenbeath......
-
Robertson v kinneil Cannel and Coking Coal Company
...4 1924 S. C. (H. L.) 84, [1924] A. C. 595. 5 [1897] 1 Q. B. 502. 6 [1897] 1 Q. B. 502. 7 1924 S. C. (H. L.) 84, [1924] A. C. 595. 9 [1892] 2 Q. B. 92. 8 1924 S. C. (H. L.) 84, [1924] A. C. 10 [1897] 1 Q. B. 502. 11 [1897] 1 Q. B. 502. 12 1924 S. C. (H. L.) 84, [1924] A. C. 595. ...
Request a trial to view additional results