William Brown Thomson v HM Advocate

JurisdictionScotland
Neutral Citation1997 SCCR 121
Year1997
Date1997
CourtUnspecified Court (Scotland)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • Her Majesty's Advocate
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Justiciary
    • 6 May 2010
    ...of advocation to their Lordships in the High Court of Justiciary. Cases referred to: Thomson v HM AdvocateSCUNK 1997 JC 55; 1998 SLT 364; 1997 SCCR 121 The cause called before the High Court of Justiciary comprising the Lord Justice-General (Cullen of Whitekirk), Lord Nimmo Smith and Lord D......
  • David Mackay Against Her Majesty's Advocate
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Justiciary
    • 7 May 2015
    ...AdvocateSC 1993 JC 126; 1993 SCCR 514 Pullar v UKHRC (1996) 22 EHRR 391; 1996 SCCR 755 Thomson v HM AdvocateSC 1997 JC 55; 1998 SLT 364; 1997 SCCR 121 Watson v GriffithsUNK 2004 SCCR 723; 2004 GWD 34–694 The appeal was heard before the High Court of Justiciary, comprising the Lord Justice-C......
  • Appeal Against Conviction By Adam Lundy Against Her Majesty's Advocate
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Justiciary
    • 18 January 2018
    ...be granted (see for example Cunningham v HMA 1984 JC 37; Wilkinson v HMA 1991 SCCR 856; McDade v HM Advocate 1994 JC 186; Thomson v HMA 1997 SCCR 121). 4 [6] Renton & Brown, Criminal Procedure, sixth edition, states at para 30-33.2 that: “Authority to bring a fresh prosecution is likely to ......
  • Adam v HM Advocate
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Justiciary
    • 30 May 2006
    ...1993 SCCR 514 Russell v HM AdvocateSCUNK 1991 JC 194; 1992 SLT 25; 1991 SCCR 790 Thomson v HM AdvocateSCUNK 1997 JC 55; 1998 SLT 364; 1997 SCCR 121 The cause called before the High Court of Justiciary, comprising the Lord Justice-Clerk (Gill), Lord Macfadyen and Lord Penrose, for a hearing ......
1 books & journal articles
  • When Should a Retrial be Permitted After a Conviction is Quashed on Appeal?
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 74-5, September 2011
    • 1 September 2011
    ...493;Ma illey vHM Advocate1993SCCR 535;McDade vHM Advocate1994SCCR 627;Sinclair vHM Advocate1995 SCCR 221; ThomsonvHM Advocate 1997 SCCR 121.109 Wilkinson vHM Advocate19 91 SC C R 8 5 6.110 The issue may be clari¢ed by the SupremeCourt’s decision in RvMaxwell [2010] UKSC48. Theappealwas dism......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT