William Brown Thomson v HM Advocate
Jurisdiction | Scotland |
Neutral Citation | 1997 SCCR 121 |
Year | 1997 |
Date | 1997 |
Court | Unspecified Court (Scotland) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Her Majesty's Advocate
...of advocation to their Lordships in the High Court of Justiciary. Cases referred to: Thomson v HM AdvocateSCUNK 1997 JC 55; 1998 SLT 364; 1997 SCCR 121 The cause called before the High Court of Justiciary comprising the Lord Justice-General (Cullen of Whitekirk), Lord Nimmo Smith and Lord D......
-
David Mackay Against Her Majesty's Advocate
...AdvocateSC 1993 JC 126; 1993 SCCR 514 Pullar v UKHRC (1996) 22 EHRR 391; 1996 SCCR 755 Thomson v HM AdvocateSC 1997 JC 55; 1998 SLT 364; 1997 SCCR 121 Watson v GriffithsUNK 2004 SCCR 723; 2004 GWD 34–694 The appeal was heard before the High Court of Justiciary, comprising the Lord Justice-C......
-
Appeal Against Conviction By Adam Lundy Against Her Majesty's Advocate
...be granted (see for example Cunningham v HMA 1984 JC 37; Wilkinson v HMA 1991 SCCR 856; McDade v HM Advocate 1994 JC 186; Thomson v HMA 1997 SCCR 121). 4 [6] Renton & Brown, Criminal Procedure, sixth edition, states at para 30-33.2 that: “Authority to bring a fresh prosecution is likely to ......
-
Adam v HM Advocate
...1993 SCCR 514 Russell v HM AdvocateSCUNK 1991 JC 194; 1992 SLT 25; 1991 SCCR 790 Thomson v HM AdvocateSCUNK 1997 JC 55; 1998 SLT 364; 1997 SCCR 121 The cause called before the High Court of Justiciary, comprising the Lord Justice-Clerk (Gill), Lord Macfadyen and Lord Penrose, for a hearing ......
1 books & journal articles
-
When Should a Retrial be Permitted After a Conviction is Quashed on Appeal?
...493;Ma illey vHM Advocate1993SCCR 535;McDade vHM Advocate1994SCCR 627;Sinclair vHM Advocate1995 SCCR 221; ThomsonvHM Advocate 1997 SCCR 121.109 Wilkinson vHM Advocate19 91 SC C R 8 5 6.110 The issue may be clari¢ed by the SupremeCourt’s decision in RvMaxwell [2010] UKSC48. Theappealwas dism......